accusation
== ==It could be a "Law Suit."
canadian law is better than hammurabi's law because hammurabi's law is way more harsher than canadian laws today. of course, if our law was as harsh as hammurabi's today, there would be less crimes. in canadian law, the people who decide if you are going to jail/if you are guilty, have to ask questions to themselves like 'did the accused person of the crime do his actions on purpose','how old is this person...' and it goes on and on. when in hammurabi's law no questions asked you would be killed right away. in my opinion i would rather have the canadian law more than hammurabi's.
The Hammurabi's code was not fair to everyone because if you hit a lower class person, you don't have to pay that much when you hit a upper class person. But, it was fair in some ways, that the punishments were so harsh that it would warn people not to do it.
When the judge himself or herself initiates an action against a person or company for a violation of law about which nobody has lodged any complaint to any public authority -- but about which judge has himself came to know through personal experience. Suppose a person slaps another man in open road and suddenly a judge sees that incident -- now even if nobody has complained to the police about this incident or nobody has told the judge about this incident -- but as the judge has himself seen this incident--he can initiate action against that person himself in a court of law Such a case is known as "Suomoto case". Suomoto cases generally end up in the conviction of the person against whom the action is initiated. The chances of acquittal in such cases are very minor.
Hammurabi was the first person to write a code-a written set of laws. It did not matter if you were rich or poor, everyone was expected to obey them. If you broke these laws you were punished.
a complaint against another person
Accusation
* Disgusting * Unmannered
== ==It could be a "Law Suit."
A beef is a complaint. If you have no beef, you have no complaint against that person.
A person or Party begins a civil case against another party by a complaint being introduced. This complaint must be shown to the Court House where it is decided to be ruled or not. To begin a civil case or complaint against another party, the complainant/plaintiff must file a lawsuit/complaint in court to initiate the case. This would also involve paying the proper filing fees and yes, often, a lawyer would be necessary in order to prepare your pleading.
Accusation
Perhaps you are referring to a "John Doe" (or "Jane Doe') complaint or warrant?
A plaintiff is the party who brings a civil lawsuit against another party, known as the defendant, seeking legal remedy or compensation for harm or breach of contract. The plaintiff is responsible for proving their case against the defendant in court.
the plaintiff, that is the person filing the complaint against you.
File a complaint with the State Supreme Court, not the bar association, which is just an attorneys club.
Hammurabi He was the one who created the code of Hammurabi