All Executives have in varying capacity a rule making authority. Laws in general will stipulate a necessary outcome or the forbidding of an action.
So how we enforce the laws relies heavily on the rules crafted (most of the time for the work flow process).
Legal Precedent to some degree is a legal rule, as it is applicable to future trial situations.
Rules tell you how to do it, laws tell you what you have to do.
Legal and legal rules have the similarity is all rules are concerned with establishing codes of behaviour for people.
The difference between legal rules and moral rules has to do with laws and how we behave regarding a moral code. Legal rules are based on laws that are set forth for us to follow. Moral rules have to do with a person's ethics. For example, it is not illegal to keep money that is found, but a person of high morals might try to return the money to the proper owner.
The Immaculate Reception was a legal play according to the rules of football.
yes . What sort of rules are we talking about? Social 'rules' or legal rules?
I want the legal act of macerated foetus
Fraser Birt
Non-legal rules are simply rules that are not legally binding. Examples would be parents setting their own rules for their kids, or sporting clubs not allowing footy boots in the club rooms.
Organizations usually comply the rules when they are being set up. The rules are usually based on a legal framework.
false! they do have binding legal effects
Procedural rules are guidelines that dictate the process by which legal proceedings are conducted in courts or other legal settings. They establish the framework for how cases are processed, including filing procedures, timelines, and the conduct of hearings. These rules ensure fairness and consistency in legal proceedings, allowing parties to understand their rights and obligations. Essentially, procedural rules help to maintain order and efficiency in the legal system.
rules on whether it is legal or illegal
legal