Want this question answered?
i dont know, but it is invasive
I don't think they would be synonymous. Nonnative species can live in a habitat without causing any adverse effects on that habitat, the nonnative species can become invasive if it causes any negative effects on the habitat. An example of a nonnative invasive species would be the python in the Florida swamp land. These hardy snakes are wreaking havoc by eating fish, birds, even alligator eggs and babies! The two words are often used interchangeably because it is often hard to find nonnative species that do not harm the environment they are introduced to, but it is possible and seen in some fish and bird introductions.
Nonnative species have no natural controls or competitors and will become more and more invasive. They can crowd out native species until they no longer exist.
a non native species is a species that isn't within a certain ecosystem.
The fish shares a niche with another species
no
There is no such thing as an "invasive koala". Koalas are not invasive as they are native to Australia, and have not been introduced to any other country.
Koalas are not invasive. They are native to Australia, and have not been introduced to any other country.
The introduced fish species would not become an invasive species if the fish shares a niche with the native species.
Not in the Americas where they are native animals. However, in some parts of Asia and Europe where they were introduced, they have become invasive pests.
"Invasive Species" is a term used to describe a species that is taken from it's natural environment and introduced somewhere else. The species then cause harm to the new environment it was introduced in.
In its natural range in the Americas, raccoons are natives and not an introduced or invasive species. As a result of escapes and deliberate introductions in the mid-20th century, raccoons are now also distributed across mainland Europe, Caucasia, and Japan where they might be considered as invasive.