In an adaptive design approach, the four traditional system development activities (requirements analysis,design, development, and implementation) are combined into a single phase, which is iteratively repeated in a relatively short time. In the framework of adaptive design the major components include the builder, the user, and the technical system(DSS). During the design process, these elements interact with (îInfluenceî) each other. Hence, three adaptive links are established in this framework: the user-system, the user-builder and the builder system. In this framework, the user is either the manager or individual faced with a problem or opportunity. The user is responsible for taking action and its consequences. In some cases, the user may not directly interact with the technical system.
Decision support depends on how structured a particular problem that needs solving is.
Traditional approach, Current practice approach, reaction approach, cafeteria approach, human service approach
The Linear sequential model suggests a systematic sequential approach to software development. That begins at the system level and progresses through analysis, design, coding, testing, and support.
as long as you need and decision making
A useful decision matrix for quantifying and comparing alternatives in the design trade-off process is the Pugh Matrix (or Pugh Concept Selection Matrix). This matrix allows teams to evaluate various design concepts against a set of criteria, such as supportability, producibility, and testability, by scoring each alternative relative to a baseline. By assigning weights to each criterion based on their importance, teams can calculate a total score for each design, facilitating an objective comparison that aids in selecting the most viable option. This structured approach ensures that decisions are data-driven and aligned with project goals.
Decision support depends on how structured a particular problem that needs solving is.
Robert K. Tyson has written: 'Principles of adaptive optics' -- subject(s): Adaptive Optics, Optics, Adaptive 'Astronomical adaptive optics systems and applications III' -- subject(s): Congresses, Adaptive Optics, Astronomical instruments, Imaging systems in astronomy, Design and construction 'Lighter side of adaptive optics' -- subject(s): Adaptive Optics, Humor, Imaging systems in astronomy, Optics, Adaptive
The "supportability analysis" phase of the life cycle product support and system engineering processes is critical for influencing design and determining cost-effective support solutions. This phase involves assessing the system's design to identify potential maintenance challenges, logistics requirements, and operational impacts. By integrating support considerations early in the design process, organizations can optimize resource allocation, reduce lifecycle costs, and enhance system reliability and usability. This proactive approach ensures that supportability is a key factor in decision-making throughout the system's development and operational phases.
Richard Brough has written: 'The design and construction of a decision-support system for planning local hospital services'
K. G. Swift has written: 'Knowledge-based design for manufacture' -- subject(s): Expert systems (Computer science), Engineering design, Computer-aided design 'Process selection' -- subject(s): Decision support systems, Production planning, Manufacturing processes, Decision making
Hairong Gao has written: 'Design of high-speed summing circuitry and comparator for adaptive parallel multi-level decision feedback equalization' -- subject(s): Feedback control systems, Parallel processing (Electronic computers), Analog-to-digital converters, Computer arithmetic, Design and construction
Michael K. Masten has written: 'Design of adaptive control systems through utilization of sensitivity concepts' -- subject(s): Adaptive control systems
approach, design, manner, mode
David Brian Kelly has written: 'The design, production and evaluation of a decision support system applied to Public Library Management'
Top down approach is based on Chip level flow, If the design is small then we can opt for this approach . Bottom down approach is hierarchical based chip design flow, If our Design is big, then , the chip is divided in to small manageable modules, it is similar to "Divide and Conquer approach", Finish the small manageable modules , so that the run time will be controlled, and then finally integrate in to one-chip.
A decision tree in product design serves as a visual tool to map out various design choices and their potential outcomes, helping teams evaluate the consequences of each option. It systematically breaks down complex decisions into simpler, more manageable parts, allowing designers to assess risks, benefits, and trade-offs. This structured approach facilitates clearer communication among stakeholders and supports informed decision-making throughout the design process. Ultimately, it aids in optimizing product features and aligning them with user needs and business goals.
Dergility is a concept that combines "design" and "agility," emphasizing the need for flexible and adaptive design processes in response to changing requirements and environments. It advocates for iterative design practices that prioritize user feedback and collaboration, allowing teams to quickly pivot and innovate. This approach is particularly valuable in industries where rapid change and responsiveness are essential for success. By fostering a culture of adaptability, dergility helps organizations better meet evolving customer needs.