The appoint of Chief Justice Corona is valid. The law is clear, Article 8, section 4 of the 1987 Constitution provides "The Supreme Court shall be composed of a Chief Justice and Fourteen Associate Justices. It may sit en banc or in its discretion, in divisions of three, five, or seven Members. Any vacancy shall be filled within ninety days from the occurence thereof.
Renato Corona was appointed as Chief Justice of the Philippines by former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo in 2010. His appointment was met with controversy, as allegations of corruption and partiality arose during his impeachment trial in 2012. Ultimately, Corona was found guilty and removed from office due to his failure to accurately disclose his financial assets, resulting in his appointment being highly criticized.
REYNATO PUNO was the chief justice before RENATO CORONA..! -_-
Chief Justice Renato Corona
Renato corona
renato corona
Renato C. Corona
chief justice renato corona
Iglesia ni Cristo
Pio@sc.judiciary.gov.ph
Yes, he should be convicted because of the strong evidences against him!
The Philippines is still in the process of selecting a Chief Justice to replace former Chief Justice Renato C. Corona who was impeached.On August 28, 2012, President Benigno S. Aquino III appointed Maria Lourdes Sereno as Chief Justice.
No
The effects to the economy after the impeachment of Chief Justice Corona should be minimal to none. Chief justices usally do not play a major part in the structure of an economy and a new justice will be established anyway.