No. There is no scientific evidence to support the Aquatic Ape Hypothesis. Nor are there any scientific papers in any reputable, peer reviewed scientific journals that support this hypothesis. After the last proponent to support this hypothesis, Hardy 1960(marine biologist), the main prominent proponent of it is Elaine Morgan who is not a scientist but a screenwriter.
of course not they are computer figures but the computer makes them look real
No. In fact, they didn't use real apes in Rise of the Planet of the Apes. They used animation to the delight of animal-rights groups. :-)
No, they were all fake.
Because people are searching their origins in aquatic animals like Dolphins same as in apes and humans.
As there is no real evidence of these apes, the answer would an speculative.
seaworld
Marine is used as an adjective when it is describing something found in or produced by the sea. (Example: marine life, marine plants) Aquatic is of or relating to water. (Example: aquatic sports, aquatic animals, aquatic plants)
Ecocolumn is a model of how the world interacts. The model is made of plastic soda bottles and has aquatic space for fishes and aquatic plants, it has a part with soil to grow some seeds and a space in between. This model shows how the world interacts and maintain itself. We did it in my APES class.
Yes they are real. They are tropical aquatic animals with large mouths in lizard-like heads.
Aquariums help to educate the public by showing them real aquatic life and showing information about the species.
seaworld
"Planet of the Apes" (1968) "Beneath the Planet of the Apes" (1970) "Escape from the Planet of the Apes" (1971) "Conquest of the Planet of the Apes: (1972) "Battle for the Planet of the Apes" (1973) "Planet of the Apes" (2001) "Rise of the Planet of the Apes" (2011)