Not really. It is not common.
But, there is a very rare condition called adermatoglyphia because of which people are born without fingerprints. Note that this is not common. This is VERY rare. If not for this condition, babies are born with fingerprints.
Yes.
babies are born in the spring, but without fur
who ever said that last answer is a freaking idiot
Sight and full plumage.
we would not be able to hold things proply and people would not be able to be identifid with fingerprints
Hi, Most Some Babies are Born Without a "Anus" Because A Deform While Growing Inside The Woman, Or A Accident Happen, Some Deform Babies are Caused By Smoking, Drug Use, Or Smoking, But This Is Kinda Immature Question To Ask.
Every person has a unique (except for identical twins) genetic code that defines what their fingerprints will be. We are born with them.
To enable you to grip things without them slipping out of your hands
fingerprints are made of organic compounds that absorb UV light and then emit visible light.
Vincent Freeman is conceived and born without the aid of this technology. Most of the babies in GATTACA were test tube babies. Vincent was a in-valid because of this.
Human babies are born with skeletons but without their patellas or knee caps. And the skull is not yet fully developed, it will fuse into a single bone as they get older.
The most babies that have been known to haven given birth at once is 9 babies. But the most children in one pregnancy (with fertilization) is 15, but none of them survived. Without fertilization though, the most kids in one pregnancy is 12, but none survive sadly.