Because guns and cannons are much more effective.
Seige catapults.
The ancient Greeks used the first catapults to fend off the Romans back in the B.C.'s. The earliest recorded date for the mangonel (fixed bowl) catapult is about 750 B.C. Catapults were used well in the middle ages until replaced by cannons.
Heavy guns; cannons and mortars, replaced catapaults circa the 14th Century.
yes they use catapults
The advent of gunpowder and cannons during the Renaissance led to a disuse of catapults for military purposes.
Because guns and cannons are much more effective.
They served as cannons before gunpowder came along.
I would say catapults also cannons
catapults, grappling hooks, rams, or cannons are all late medieval siege weapons
castles were attacked by invaders shooting at the castles with arrows, cannons, catapults, trebuchets or a battering ram.
Seige catapults.
They could fire longer and hit harder. They were also a lot smaller and easier to move around.
It depends on what revolution. If you are talking about the Revolutionary War in 1755, then no. Cannons were created and they caused by far more damage than a catapult.
The ancient Greeks used the first catapults to fend off the Romans back in the B.C.'s. The earliest recorded date for the mangonel (fixed bowl) catapult is about 750 B.C. Catapults were used well in the middle ages until replaced by cannons.
Heavy guns; cannons and mortars, replaced catapaults circa the 14th Century.
swords, shield's, bows, catapults, ballistas, spears, javelins, axes, maces, warhammers, tridents, nets and depending on the era and region siege weapons like elephants, cannons and trebuchets