0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why are robots not considered living things?
they do not have the eight charicteristics of life
What percentage of oxygen is there in a living thing?
It varies from living thing to living thing.
Why is sugar not a living thing?
Sugar is not a living thing, but sugar does come from sugar canes which is a living thing :)
Is a clone a living or non living thing?
In biological terms, a clone is a living thing. For example, Dolly the sheep was a clone, and clearly she was a living thing.
Is an apple seed a living thing?
It is a dormant living thing. Under the right conditions, it becomes an active living thing.
Was a light bulb ever part of a living thing?
No, but some robots have had light bulbs in them and they could be considered a being. They just wouldn't be a living being/thing.
What do you think robots should be used for?
Robots are a part of the miloforcinous process in which a non-living thing can produce a telocpis movement that a main telocpisnephous can create.
Are robots living?
no
Are robots living things?
no
Are all the robot made for the same thing?
If your question is are robots all made for the same thing the answer is no, their are robots made to do surgical procedures from robots that can change a tire
What do you go on to talk to girl robots?
As robots are not living beings or sexually reproducing beings, they have no gender.
Do robots have one or more cells?
Robots do not have one or more cells because it is not a living organism.
Non-living thing that look like living thing?
Fungi is your answer :)
Why is robot a non living thing?
a robot is a non living thing because it has no respiratory system or cardivasicullar system
Can a robot be living?
Currently, the definition of living excludes robots definitely. However, personally I feel that Humans are pretty similar to robots, in the fact that Humans are 'programmed' in a way, as anything you do is pretty much justifiable, just maybe the 'coding' and 'programming' is more complex. But I feel that robots may be more and more similar to living things, maybe even considered to be living one day, like how some robots can 'learn' nowadays.
Why are robots not considered living things?
they do not have the eight charicteristics of life
What was the oldest Victorian robot?
There is no such thing as victorian robots.
