Statistically, no.
Guns are better than swords. Swords are USELESS. They aren't use anymore because we have guns which are better and more advanced weapon. Swords have been in the time of gladiators, vikings, and ninjas. Today, we use guns and NOT swords because guns are a more effective and lethal weapon.Swords are USELESS. They suck and will LOSE against a Gun. Guns are BETTER. And whoever say Swords are Better, They Suck Balls.
Swords can reflect bullets(block bullets) but somehow, swords cannot run out of ammo. Yes, swords are deadlier than guns because they can slice. Guns can run out of bullets because they shoot and have to reload. Guns fire and reload after firing and then reload after firing until there are nomore bullets left. Swords does not need to reload. They can continue to kill more enemies without having to reload. Guns can kill enemies but swords can kill even more enemies. Real men use swords, not guns. <><><><> I would pont out that modern day armies and law enforcement officers use firearms, not swords.
No, swords are weapons that don't run out of ammo like guns. Guns run out of ammo, not swords. Swords have infinite ammo. Their infinite ammo is their blade, not bullets. Guns run out of ammo and have to be reloaded. Some how, swords are better than guns because swords can deflect bullets. Guns uses bullets and swords uses blades.
Neither. Disease has killed more people than any of the two you mention
Yes and no. Poor quality swords can be gotten for as low as $20. Good quality swords can cost in the thousands.
yes because we are apes and we have guns
It depends on how far and how many ammo are left. Guns are better than swords in shooting range and reloading ammo(bullets). Swords are better than guns in close combat and doesn't run out of ammo. Somehow, swords can block bullets that guns had fired. Gun weapons cannot slice like blade weapons but they can shoot from great distances but guns also have problems. They have to reload after they ran out of ammo. Guns have to reload so they can fire again and have reload another clip of rounds(ammo) until there are nomore bullets. Swords are the only blade weapons that have unlimited ammo, their blade. This means that swords does not need to reload another clip of bullets. Swords are silent weapons because they're not loud like guns. Guns are noisy weapons and they don't have unlimited ammo. Guns would probably win swords in shooting range from great distances but swords would win against guns for blocking those bullets and attack in close range combat.
Don't you mean more dangerous than guns? Well, cars are bigger, so they have more potential energy. If that potential energy is released, then it could kill some one. If there was a gun as big as a car... Things would change.
As a sport, not for means of defense. The yakuza uses guns more than swords, but occasionaly there are reports of murders using katanas (samurai sword) hope this helps
Romeo means that Juliet's attractiveness is very dangerous to Romeo, moreso than twenty swords. Juliet's attractiveness is dangerous because the feelings it incites in Romeo may (and in fact do) make him do things hazardous to his health.
With violence, using whatever weapon was going on at the time. Swords are probably more common than guns, although that has been done too.
All guns use gunpowder (gun+powder= gunpowder). The 15th century saw early crude guns first being used, including use in war. However, the early guns were not accurate nor reliable, and the military still used bows, swords, lances and pikes MUCH more frequently than guns.