No this is not the case.
A degree of exactness of a numeric integration formula is the highest number for which all polynomials of degree equal or less than the number, satisfy the condition that the formula for them is precise (0 error)
That means that you divide one polynomial by another polynomial. Basically, if you have polynomials "A" and "B", you look for a polynomial "C" and a remainder "R", such that: B x C + R = A ... such that the remainder has a lower degree than polynomial "B", the polynomial by which you are dividing. For example, if you divide by a polynomial of degree 3, the remainder must be of degree 2 or less.
"Less" is the comparative degree of little.
"Less" is the comparative degree of little. The superlative degree is least.
its Less than 90 degree
comparative
This is an Obtuse angle, greater than 90 but less than 180 degrees
Strictly we do not classify polynomials by the number of terms but by the highest power of the variable (its degree).For example, if x is the variable then a polynomial with highest power...... x0 (degree 0) is a constant e.g. 4x0 = 4... x1 (degree 1) is linear e.g. 2x1 + 5 = 2x + 5... x2 (degree 2) is a quadratic e.g. 3x2 - 2x + 1... x3 (degree 3) is a cubic e.g. 2x3 - 3x2 - 2x + 1... x4 (degree 4) is a quartic e.g. 7x4 + 2x3 - 3x2 - 2x + 1(degree 5) quintic, (degree 6) sextic, (degree 7) septic, (degree 8) octic,...Although it appears as if the degree of a polynomial is always one less than the number of terms, in general this not the case. For example, x3 - 9 is cubic with only 2 terms or 4x8 is an octic with only one term.
They are obtuse angles.
The next generation telescope will have the two or twin telescopes. One will have to be stationed at the Lagrangian point 4 and the other at the Lagrangian point 5. So together they will act like the pair of your eyes. So you can penetrate in the space out of your universe also. Then you can locate the source of cosmic microwave back ground also, most probably. The cosmic dust coming in the way of one telescope and not in the way of other can be easily deleted by simple computer. By this mechanism you can increase the size of the lens of the telescope to hundreds of thousands of kilo meters. The processing unit can be kept at Lagrangian point one. This telescope should cost less than or about the same as the James Web telescope.
Grade 2 or less. ;)
Its "least" Little-less-least.