This one is easy! The military can't force people to host soldiers in their home anymore!
The Third amendment prohibits, In peace time, the quartering of soldiers (military personnel) in private residences, without the owner's consent. It makes quartering soldiers legally permissible in wartime only, but only in accordance with law.
See link below for more details.
This amendment affects us today, because if this law was not passed, then soldiers could, at any time, come and practically live with you. When you still have to feed them and everything else.
No. The Third Amendment is one of the least cited parts of the Bill of Rights, and was only included because England's practice of housing British soldiers in private homes was denounced in the Declaration of Independence. In fact, this grievance against King George is considered one of the fundamental causes of the Revolutionary War.
Third Amendment
"No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law."
It is not clear whether the United States violated the Third Amendment during the War of 1812 and the Civil War, when it required US citizens to house troops, because virtually no legal action arose from the practice.
There is only one relatively significant federal case that rests on the terms of the Third Amendment, Engblom v. Carey, 677 F.2d 957 (2d. c. 1982). In Engblom, a group of New York state prison corrections officers were unceremoniously evicted from prison housing at Mid-Orange Correctional Facility when they staged a strike. Their residences were subsequently used to house members of the National Guard. Two corrections officers argued that their Third Amendment rights had been violated, but the courts granted defendants' (a variety of New York government officials) motion for summary judgment and dismissed the case on the grounds that the Plaintiffs had no standing because the homes belonged to the prison. This case never reached the US Supreme Court.
In United States v. Valenzuela, 95 F.Supp 363 (S.D. Cal. 1951), Valenzuela attempted to argue federal rent control laws violated Third Amendment rights, but the court dismissed his suit.
Justice William O. Douglas briefly cited the Third Amendment in his opinion for Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 US 479 (1965) as an instance where the Framer's intended to protect individuals' right to privacy. Griswold challenged the states' rights to restrict use of birth control for married couples.
The 3rd Amendment is part of the Bill of Rights. I'm not sure of the EXACT law, you will have to look that up, but it states things like freedom of speech, freedom of religion, the right to bear arms, etc.
the military cant't force people to host soldiers in their homes
to not kill every one
Nothing, the third amendment to the Belgian constitution establishes new regional institutions and transfers responsibility for education to the local communities.
Alcohol
Poll Taxes
The proposed marriage amendment define marriage as a union between a man and woman. It would thus prohibit same-sex marriages.
The third amendment
It is the fifth amendment
It's one of these; A. Eighteenth Amendment B. Fourteenth Amendment C. Nineteenth Amendment D. Twentieth Amendment
The Eighth Amendment
The amendment that forbids troops being lodged into private homes is the third amendment. (:
made it illegal to sell alcoholic drinks Eighteenth Amendment
prohibit the transport of liquor into states where its illegal
Yes the 18th amendment was Prohibition. Aka the ban on all liquor products.