When you read a book you only need to pay once to buy it, and you can read it over and over again. But when you watch a movie ,as time past and you will forget all about it. And its like giving away your money.
That ultimately depends on personal preference. Some people might find reading books more enjoyable because it allows for imagination and deeper engagement with the material, while others might prefer watching TV for the visual and auditory stimulation it provides.
Books are definitly better than television. It enable people to actually use their imagination instead of just sitting around watching something. Books are also better than television because it teaches you more and can actually make you smarter.
Well I can't really answer this question because it depends on what book it is. === === I'm assuming your referring to books in general and not a specific book. Thus, I believe it's because of your imagination which typically sways toward your personal preferences in terms of suspense, looks of characters and their personalities, the surrounding environment of where the story takes place, etc. === ===
No, but you can learn more from reading.If you pick up a fiction book you would be more able to learn because reading can improve your knowledge,teach you more vocabulary and also improve your reading skills.however watching scientific tv programs [like "National Geografic"] can also improve your knowledge and vocabulary but can also make your eyes feel tired and heavy.
Reading contains more details like character's thoughts, etc.
well watching TV makes u lazy SO that is bad well personally i think reading books are better than watching TV and books are educational
No,books are much more emersive and many times, more interesting than TV. Also, you can hurt your eyes by watching TV. Did you know that every hour of TV you watch, shortens your life by 2 minutes? Also, reading can increase your vocabuluary, imagination, and sometimes knowlege too!
Books are better to read then watching the movie first because if you are reading the book you can imagine the place it's at and or you can visualize what the characters look like. On television you have what the characters look like and what the place looks like.it is all there for you when watching a movie, but when you are reading a book it exercises your brain and puts it to work.SO READ DON'T WATCH TELEVISION!!!!
1. reading makes you smarter 2. tv makes you fat 3.its bad for your eyes
Yes, reading books typically requires more use of imagination because the reader must mentally create the world and characters described in the text. Watching TV presents visual and auditory stimuli, whereas reading books allows for interpretation and visualization based on the reader's imagination.
i think they will prefer watching TV than reading .because reading is words and pictures .
Reading books allows for deeper engagement with the material, encourages critical thinking, and can improve vocabulary and comprehension skills. It also provides a break from screen time and can be a more relaxing and immersive experience compared to watching TV.
Reading is not usually faster than watching the movie. However, the movie and book probably will be very different.
It's not. Go read a book and get a life
Reading has lost its appeal to many people for several reasons. To read, you have to think more, and watching television is more of a passive activity. Also, many TV programs have flashy bright colors and action, so it seems more exciting to some people. But it is actually less healthy for your brain than reading.
I think that with books, you have to use your brain more in order to find what you are looking for or use your imagination. It's like reading a book then watching the movie. The book seems to be always better.
Movies are basically more interesting than books, usually movies are more famous than its books. Sometimes, it is easier to understand when things are acted out especially when children or foreigners are watching..