No, it isn't divisible by either
No. All multiples of 6 are even and 129 is odd so it cannot be divisible by 6.
129 is divisible by: 1 3 43 129.
129 is divisible by 1 3 43 and 129.
You can tell a number is divisible by 3 when the sum of its digits is equal to 3 or a multiple of three. In this instance, 1 + 2 + 9 = 12/3 = 4, therefore 129 is divisible by 3.
Yes, 72 is divisible by 9. It is not divisible by 8 or 6.
No. All multiples of 6 are even and 129 is odd so it cannot be divisible by 6.
No, not evenly.
387 is divisible by: 1 3 9 43 129 and 387.
129 is divisible by 3. 1+2+9=12 and 12 is divisible by 3. That is the rule of divisibility by 3.
129 is divisible by: 1 3 43 129.
Multiples of 9 and 6 are also divisible by three, the reverse is not true. 15 is divisible by 3, but not 6 or 9. 27 is divisible by 3 and 9, but not 6. 12 is divisible by 3 and 6, but not 9. 54 is divisible by 3, 6 and 9.
129 is divisible by 1 3 43 and 129.
You can tell a number is divisible by 3 when the sum of its digits is equal to 3 or a multiple of three. In this instance, 1 + 2 + 9 = 12/3 = 4, therefore 129 is divisible by 3.
Yes. 1 + 2 + 9 = 12 12 is divisible by 3. If the sum of the digits of a number are divisible by 3, then the whole number is divisible by 3. 129 is a composite number because it divisible by a factor other than 1 and itself.
Yes, 72 is divisible by 9. It is not divisible by 8 or 6.
126 is divisible by 6 and 9
No, 9 is divisible by 3 and 9, but not six 3 x 9 = 27, also not divisible by 6