No
This is hard to answer because there can be many variables involved. The noncustodial parent may contest the move and take the custodial parent to court to show cause. But it may not be possible for the noncustodial parent to actually prevent the move unless the move is out of state.
No you are not. It is the noncustodial parent's responsibility to make arrangements to visit the child. All this should be included in your custody papers.
When they move out of the custodial parent's home see links
16
Generally the noncustodial parent may move anywhere - within or outside the state where the children live. The court grants the noncustodial parent the right to visit the children but does not force the noncustodial parent to take advantage of that right. However, a court may require the noncustodial parent to provide the custodial parent with contact information and, where issues develop about the care or safety of the children, the court may require supervised visitation or at least that the noncustodial parent advise the custodial parent where the children will be.
You need parental consent to move until you are 18.
noI'm in KCMO
You can move a child support case from Arizona to Nevada ONLY IF ALL Parents agree - the custodial parent and the non-custodial parent - with the move. See the related like.Section 611 also provides that the final, nonmodifiable aspects of a child support order may not be modified. For example, if the issuing state issued an order that child support terminates at age 21, the responding state cannot change that aspect of the order, even if support in the responding state ends at age 18. To make this Section work, Section 612 provides the deference to the support order of a sister state that was missing in URESA.For purposes of illustration, let us take a number of examples where the parties are in different states. (Unless otherwise stated, assume that the custodial parent and child have been living in STATE 1 for the last six consecutive months.)Example 1: Custodial parent and child are in STATE 1; noncustodial parent is in STATE 2. STATE 1 has issued an order; STATE 2 has not. The controlling order is in STATE 1.Example 2: Custodial parent and child are in STATE 1; noncustodial parent is in STATE 2. STATE 1 has not issued an order; STATE 2 has issued an order. The controlling order is in STATE 2.Example 3: Custodial parent and child are in STATE 1; noncustodial parent is in STATE 2. STATE 1 has issued an order; STATE 2 has issued an order. Assuming that the child has been in STATE 1 for the prior consecutive six months, the controlling order is in STATE 1.Example 4: Custodial parent and child are in STATE 1; noncustodial parent is in STATE 2. STATE 1 has issued an order; STATE 3 has issued an order. The controlling order is in STATE 1.Example 5: Custodial parent and child are in STATE 1; noncustodial parent is in STATE 2. STATE 1 has issued an order; STATE 2 has issued an order. This time, however, the child had been in STATE 1 for one month before STATE 1's order was issued; prior to that, the child had lived in STATE 2 for at least the prior consecutive six months. The controlling order is in STATE 2.Example 6: Custodial parent and child are in STATE 1; noncustodial parent is in STATE 2. STATE 1 issued an order in 1990; STATE 2 issued an order in 1994. This time, the child has been in STATE 1 for one month and, prior to that, had been in STATE 2 for two months. The controlling order is in STATE 2.Example 7: Custodial parent and child are in STATE 1; noncustodial parent is in STATE 2. STATE 3 has issued an order; STATE 4 has issued an order. There is no controlling order, and STATE 1 or STATE 2 may issue an order. The first order issued will have priority.
it shouldnt matter. if the parent has custidy and the other dont and there is no visitation rights then then yes the perant can move
ay
Well, if court says your child does not have to ever see the other parent then yes. But if not then no.