This depends on what you define as "crime." If you define "crime" as "an illegal act," or "something that is against the law," then no, as a definitional matter, "crime" cannot exist without law. This is why, for example, some people talk about "decriminalizing" marijuana and "legalizing" marijuana as if this were the same thing.
Of course, it really does us no good to say that "crime would not exist without law," because the same actions which we now call "crimes" (and which society deems repugnant enough to forbid through law) would still exist no matter what. Because it's the harm-causing action that we care about (not the word itself), it would be completely counterproductive to try to eliminate "crime" by taking away laws.
To answer this question we must examine society and the hierarchy of the government. Who decides what is law rules what is a crime. By breaking the law one commits a crime. Without the law there would be no crime, this is excluding moral and ethic code. Say a law of censorship is passed and anyone that watches explicit sexual videos is fined and jailed. Before the law was passed the crime did not exist, or happen, because there was no law to break and no crime to commit. In a sense law creates crime by making rules.
No
law and order
Double jeopardy
Law means a set of rules,regulations and principles by following which the society runs, on the other hand, crime can be defined as an act or omission forbidden by the state and to which a punishment has been attached. The relationship between crime and law is without the strict enforcement of the law crime can not be prevented.
Yes, signature forgery is a crime. It involves falsely replicating someone's signature without their permission, which is illegal and punishable by law.
Yes, stealing food is considered a crime because it involves taking something that does not belong to you without permission, which is against the law.
a crime
no
Technology makes absolutely no difference. If the offense is a crime according to statutes passed by the state legislature then law enforcment must and will respond to it. The second question is MUCH too open-ended to address, without being narrowed down.
In the state of Oklahoma, if the child is a witness to a crime, then YES Law Enforcement may question a child. If the Child is a suspect in a crime then not without a parent or guardian or an attorney.
The law of conservation of energy is a very important foundation to our entire scientific world. It is not "used". It just is. Without it, nothing would work, we would not exist, the universe would not exist.