This depends on what you define as "crime." If you define "crime" as "an illegal act," or "something that is against the law," then no, as a definitional matter, "crime" cannot exist without law. This is why, for example, some people talk about "decriminalizing" marijuana and "legalizing" marijuana as if this were the same thing.
Of course, it really does us no good to say that "crime would not exist without law," because the same actions which we now call "crimes" (and which society deems repugnant enough to forbid through law) would still exist no matter what. Because it's the harm-causing action that we care about (not the word itself), it would be completely counterproductive to try to eliminate "crime" by taking away laws.
To answer this question we must examine society and the hierarchy of the government. Who decides what is law rules what is a crime. By breaking the law one commits a crime. Without the law there would be no crime, this is excluding moral and ethic code. Say a law of censorship is passed and anyone that watches explicit sexual videos is fined and jailed. Before the law was passed the crime did not exist, or happen, because there was no law to break and no crime to commit. In a sense law creates crime by making rules.
No
law and order
Double jeopardy
Law means a set of rules,regulations and principles by following which the society runs, on the other hand, crime can be defined as an act or omission forbidden by the state and to which a punishment has been attached. The relationship between crime and law is without the strict enforcement of the law crime can not be prevented.
a crime
Even though law is made to avoid unconstitutional and unethical actions. It is said that law came first before the crime. Why law came first? It's because you can't identify someone's action as a crime if there is no law punishing that action. To side an instance, Australia allowed abortion and it's not considered as a crime to their country since there is no law punishing it—besides they have a law called Abortion Law that legalize abortion.
no
Technology makes absolutely no difference. If the offense is a crime according to statutes passed by the state legislature then law enforcment must and will respond to it. The second question is MUCH too open-ended to address, without being narrowed down.
In the state of Oklahoma, if the child is a witness to a crime, then YES Law Enforcement may question a child. If the Child is a suspect in a crime then not without a parent or guardian or an attorney.
The law of conservation of energy is a very important foundation to our entire scientific world. It is not "used". It just is. Without it, nothing would work, we would not exist, the universe would not exist.
Unable to answer. WHAT is a "barrier" crime law? Define the term please.