Theories can be changed or rejected if and when the scientific evidence no longer supports the theory.
they just dont agree.
The rigid protein layers present on both the sides of the lipid bilayer do not allow substances to pass through the plasma membrane.
At the time some scientists did reject the theory, but by the end of Darwin's life the theory was, tentatively, accepted. Then genetics took off and the theory was panned again. 1900 t0 1932. Then the modern synthesis arose blending genetics with systematic thought, paleontology and botany and the theory of evolution by natural selection was on much firmer footing The theory has undergone many modifications since Darwin's day, as any scientific theory does, but, aside from some minor scientific challenges, the theory is still standing more than 150 years later.
For any hypothesis to be considered a theory, a scientific journal must be written and submitted to undergo rigorous peer evaluation. The theory of evolution has sufficient evidence and support to withstand the dissection from biologists around the world. However, keep in mind that the theory of evolution is not "proven" as nothing in the realm of science can be confirmed with absolute certainty. Evolution is widely accepted among the scientifically literate. It is broadly rejected among those who hold religious objections. The theory has enjoyed tremendous success over the years, and is now considered to be the foundational theory of biology. Theodosius Dobzhansky once said, "nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution." I would consider that a pretty strong validation.
Charles Darwin rejected the Scriptures (Bible) and came up with evolution. Pierre-Louis Moreau believed that the Earth was flat. Maupertuis believed we got here by "lucky chance". These are some of the many that believe on evolution. (Hopefully you aren't one of them.)
Lavoiser rejected the phlogiston theory!
Friedrick Wohler rejected this theory in 1828 by heating ammonium cyanate in laboratory.
Alfred Wegner theory was rejected for a reason. This is because he didnt have enough information to prove that he is correct
Wohler rejected this theory by obtaining urea,an organic compound in the urine of mammals,from ammonium cyanate
A hypothesis will be rejected if it fails the necessary testing required for it to become a scientific theory.
His theory of use and disuse was rejected.
The theory of continental drift and plate tectonics
Taxation without representation was the European theory that was rejected by the writing of the Declaration of Independence in 1776. The reason for the Revolutionary War was taxation without representation.
Because he had no physical mechanism to explain how his "islands" of rock could go freely sailing about where they wanted to through the solid rock of the ocean floor. That was how his theory was seen at the time.
the church rejected the theory and tried to punish scientists for promoting it.
The Helio-centric theory was proposed by a Polish astronomer , named Nicolaus Copernicus. Galileo believed this.
One main reason scientists rejected Wegener's theory of continental drift was the lack of a plausible mechanism to explain how continents could move through the oceanic crust. Additionally, there was insufficient evidence at the time to support the idea of continents moving over time. The theory also faced criticism due to Wegener's background as a meteorologist, not a geologist.