Theories can not become laws, because the purpose of a theory is different from a law.
A theory explains a law. The law of gravity states that there is gravity- this is clearly a fact, and is concrete. Einstein's theory of gravity (or whichever theory is currently supported) explains how gravity works. Theories can be replaced if another, better explanation is formed. New theories do not need to be radically different from their predecessors, and can simply be modifications (although if the modification is very slight, it may still be considered the same theory).
Laws state that something happens, and theories state why.
*note*This is a very quick summary, intended only to answer your question. There are plenty of other details to scientific theory and law, and some pretty interesting court cases that defined them, so consider looking them up.
A theory, when proven over time, can become a law. Example: Law of Gravity and Theory of Evolution
You're playing with words ... a "law" is just a thumb nail description of a theory.
yes, if the theory proves to work every single time, it can become a law.
A theory becomes a law when it can actually be proven by all means. I think. the problem is you are not thinking! a theory can not become a law. a scientific law is a description of an observed phenomenon. a scientific theory is an explanation of an observed phenomenon. one describes and ne explains.
Theory is precursor to the law.
A law cannot become a theory, as laws are higher in scientific hierarchy than theories. Theories may become laws when the evidence for their factuality proves that the theory meets all established requirements set forth by the theory. If at any point in the scientific method a theory is disproven for the criteria that it sets forth, it can never be considered a Law. The hierarchy is thusly: Hypothesis < Theory < Law.
Proved, Universally accepted Scientific theory is Scientific Law.
a scientific law is a law in which the once-theory was tested in its theory and proven by experiment. an example of it is newton's law of gravity. a scientific theory is a theory in which it still needs to be proven. and example of it is the big bang theory.
A scientific theory is an explanation of some natural phenomenon. A scientific law is a succinct statement of some aspect of a scientific theory.
scientific law is unlike a scientific theory in a sense that its the next step above a scientific theory.A scientific law is one that has been proven, a scientific theory has not been proven yet.
A law is proven, a theory has yet to be proven
A scientific theory become a law when it is widely recognized and accepted by the scientific community in the epoch.
A scientific law is the description of a recurring event that occurs in nature. A scientific theory is an explanation of the law. The law does not change, but the theory may change when new data indicate that it needs to.
A scientific law states a pattern found in nature and a scientific theory explains that pattern
BASIC ANSWER>! Scientific law is proven (for the most part) and scientific theory is not proven yet."However scientific law is a law that cannot be broken and scientific theory is an attempt to explain a pattern or a rule repeadetly observed in nature".
A law is known to be true. There is no dispute about it. A theory is disputable. Gravity is a law, the Big Bang is a theory.
Theory - "law" is just a thumb-nail description.
Mostly semantics. A "law" is a theory that can be expressed mathematically.
A theory explains how something works - a "law" is just a thumb nail description of a theory.
The other way around. Its hard to become a theory.
a scientific theory is a description of an observed phenomenon while a scientific theory is an explanation of an observed phenomenon
A Scientific Theory is not the same thing as a Scientific Law, they are distinctly different in nature. A scientific theory summarizes a hypothesis or group of hypotheses that have been supported with repeated testing. A theory is valid as long as there is no evidence to dispute it. Therefore, theories can be disproven. Basically, if evidence accumulates to support a hypothesis, then the hypothesis can become accepted as a good explanation of a phenomenon. One definition of a theory is to say it's an accepted hypothesis. A law generalizes a body of observations. At the time it is made, no exceptions have been found to a law. Scientific laws explain things, but they do not describe them. One way to tell a law and a theory apart is to ask if the description gives you a means to explain 'why'.
A scientific law has been proven several times, while a scientific theory hasn't been proven at all
After an hypothesis becomes a theory proven beyond doubt, it can become a Scientific Law if universally accepted by the scientific community. Some scientific laws, such as Newton's laws of motion and Boyle's Law, have been found to be faulty in some regard and have subsequently been modified.