First of all, there's no such thing as "an unbalanced force". But we'll run past that
and go directly to the question.
Strange as it may seem, no force is required to keep a moving object moving.
Force is only needed to change the object's speed, or to change the direction
in which it's moving. When no force acts on it, it keeps moving just fine, at a
constant speed and heading in a straight line.
This has all been known for roughly 500 years now.
rererere
the unbalanced force would be balance.
[object Object]
The forces cause the object to move in the direction of the net force. If there are two unbalanced forces in opposite directions, the object will go in the direction of the stronger force.
unbalanced forces cause acceleration, an object in freefall has gravity as an unbalanced force.
Air, Sonny D 😛
rererere
When the entire group of forces acting on an object is unbalanced,the object will accelerate.There's no such thing as "an unbalanced force".
When an object accelerates, the force is unbalanced.
Unbalanced forces are forces that produce a nonzero net force, which changes an object's motion. The result of an unbalanced force is acceleration of an object.
Unbalanced forces are forces that produce a nonzero net force, which changes an object's motion. The result of an unbalanced force is acceleration of an object.
the unbalanced force would be balance.
There's no such thing as "an unbalanced force". But when the entire group of forceson an object is unbalanced, then the object must accelerate.
[object Object]
An unbalanced force can completely destroy the object (depending upon its mass and power of force) or can gradually move it or it can also have no effect on the object.
An unbalanced force will always make an object accelerate. If the object is at rest, it will start moving.
when an unbalanced force is accompanied by a balanced force it moves like one of newtons laws an object stays at rest in till an unbalanced force accompanies it