generally , in a classroom setting, a physical teacher is best. but at home, computers are a very good learning tool. some people just learn better by having someone there to show them how to do stuff.
Not anytime soon. Computers along with lesser trained teacher aides
may allow teachers to handle much larger classes. Computers may be able to
do most of the testing, grading and record-keeping for teachers.
Computers cannot replace teachers because human touch is more important than computers and personal presence of teachers arouse children's interest.
No, a computer can't replace a teacher. A teacher can become better with the use of computers in their classrooms.
Not at all. A computer can always help a teacher but it can never replace a teacher.
because it is just as smart as a teacher
internet should not replace teacher coz Internets are wrong sometimes so its better than to listen to a teacher rather than computer.. i admit I'm also adic in browsing the net IF i need to -monster:)
A computer teacher IS a real teacher. The only difference is the subject matter. Anyone that teaches, be it math, English, science, or computer technology, is a teacher.
Nothing - simply that a 'computer teacher' specialises in one subject.
how to you stop teacher controlling are computer by using their
a teacher or speech teacher
we can interrupt with human teacher whereas it is not possible with a computer teacher
we can interrupt with human teacher whereas it is not possible with a computer teacher
we can interrupt with human teacher whereas it is not possible with a computer teacher
yes teacher is better than computer beacuse they could explain the work for you butter the computer cannot.
we can interrupt with human teacher whereas it is not possible with a computer teacher