If duress can be shown, no it would not be legal. Proving it can be difficult but it is not impossible.
A document signed under duress is invalid. The only problem is proving the duress.
A contract signed under duress is typically considered voidable, meaning that the party who signed under duress has the option to either affirm or void the contract.
Her confession will be invalid if it was given while under duress.
yes, but it can be undone in court soon after
When someone 'forces' you to sign anything, it has been signed 'under duress', and is not considered a valid contract.If you explain the situation during the time you signed the paper to the court and tell them that you signed it 'under duress', the judge should dis-allow the paper to be used as evidence against you.
Only if both parties agree to dissolve the contract or the contract was an illegal contract or it was signed under duress.
V.C. is the latin term for signing under duress.
There are 3 classes of duress. 1. Duress to person 2. Duress to property 3. Economic Duress Contracts under into under duress to property and economic duress are voidable. Hence the injured party can choose to rescind the contract or affirm it. But for contracts entered into under duress to person, the contract is void at the start. It is treated as though there is no contract.
If you answer to an action taken under protest and duress , it means that you are under protest because you do not agree to what is being said and do not wish to make a contract and duress means that someone if forcing you to do it agaist your will which makes the document void on its face , or not valid if you use that in connection with your signature. i hope this clears things up in your mind , cheers !!! you can also learn more @ thinkfree.ca and tpuc.org
Yes, but it might not be granted.
the statement you gave should be inadmissable in court because it was given under duress
Edward II (under duress) Richard II (under duress) Edward VIII