I just found out that the term "Doctor Shopping" refers to the practice of going around to different doctors, to get more than one prescription for Narcotic painkillers. Many, many people depend on painkillers every day, and painkillers help them live a more productive life, but the government is totally paranoid about people who take painkillers, so they're making new laws to crack down on anyone who gets more than one Rx for painkillers, from more than one doctor. So, yes, from what I just researched, you can get in trouble with the law, unfortunately, for the practice of "Doctor Shopping". Since these laws are unfair to people who need painkillers, please write to your congressmen, about stopping the ridiculous over-regulation of painkillers!
There is no formal penalty.
The real problem is that you end up with lower quality medical care.
The PENALTIES OF NOT SHOPPING FOR A DOCTOR ARE of course that you know nothing about your doctor, does he have malpractice issues, is he well recommended, is he new to the area because of problems encountered elsewhere. As for shopping for price, well the price rarely dictates the quality of care as price is usually dictated by demand and the insurance industry as well as cost of overhead, office space, cost of living in a particular area. Therefor some parts of the country and sometimes the city have different rate schedules. Also some doctors work for less than others just as some plumbers work for less than others. Take in mind prescription drugs-some stores sell for less than others. Yes it pays to shop around if you can and especially if you are not covered by insurance like estimated 50-60 million Americans in the USA today.
yes
yea most likely
No it's doctor shopping unless the doctor/patient relationship was broken between the first doctor and you were sent to the other doctor. If it was for the same medication and dose, it also would be doctor shopping if filled before it was due, even if the doctor/patient relationship was broken.
Doctor shopping refers to the practice of going from one physician to another, looking for one that you like. To defend this practice, consider that the patient is paying for the service of a doctor and has a right to be satisfied that he or she has made a good choice, just as with anybody else you might hire to perform a service.
The duration of Doctor in Trouble is 1.5 hours.
When someone asks you if you are the doctor or the patient, it usually means that you are the patient but you are trying to diagnosis your symptoms as if you were the doctor.
i am sure it can't not if the doctor didn't see the patient
Doctor in Trouble was created on 1970-06-16.
A doctor can be sued for breaking doctor/patient confidentiality.
The patient was waiting for the doctor to arrive. She was a patient person.
No. In Australia there are rules against the amount of information a doctor can tell anyone. And normally talking about another patient to a patient is unacceptable and can be severely punished.
No. It is against the doctor/patient confidentiality agreement.