0
No. Rational can be an adjectival form of ratio but it can also refer to a process or behaviour that has been thought through. In the latter case it has nothing to do with numbers.
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Is 2.323323332 rational?
Yes - any number with a defined end-point is a rational number.
Is 2.14 a rational number or irrational number?
Any number with a defined end point, including 2.14, is a rational number.
Is 8 over 3 a rational number?
yes. A rational number is defined as a number that can be written as a fraction.
Is the quotient of an irrational number and a rational number always irrational?
No. It is not defined if the rational number happens to be 0.
How can you represent any rational number as a fraction?
Because a rational number is DEFINED as a number which can be expressed in that form!
Is 3.1214122144 an integer rational or irrational?
3.1214122144 is a rational number. Rational numbers are any number that can be defined as a fraction. Your number is the same as 3 and 1214122144/10000000000
Is 6.3478 a rational or irrational number?
Any number with a defined end-point, such as 6.3478, is, by definition, rational.
Is a quotient of an integer divided by a nonzero integer always a rational number?
Because that is how a rational number is defined!
Why is the quotient of an integer divided by a nonzero integer always a rational number?
Because that is how a rational number is defined!
Is -24.86 a rational number?
Yes, any number with a defined end-point, whether it be positive or negative, is a rational number.
Why does a rational number plus a rational number or a rational number multiplied by a rational number equal to rational number?
The way in which the binary functions, addition and multiplication, are defined on the set of rational numbers ensures that the set is closed under these two operations.
Is 3.245245245 a rational number?
Assuming that the number ends at that third 5, yes, the number is rational - as it has a defined end-point. If the number is equal to 3.245 recurring, then no, the number will not be rational.
