0
Yes, strong arguments can be based on false premises, made-up "facts," iffy scientific "evidence," etc. It is actually fairly common.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Yes, a strong argument can have false premises. Even if the premises are false, if the reasoning that leads from them to the conclusion is sound and persuasive, the argument may still be strong in terms of its structure and validity. However, it's important to strive for accuracy and truthfulness in the premises for a more reliable argument.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Can a deductively argument have false premises?
Yes, a deductive argument can have false premises. However, the conclusion does not follow logically if the premises are false, making the argument unsound.
How Can a strong inductive argument have a false conclusion?
A strong inductive argument can have a false conclusion if the premises are not relevant to the conclusion, even though they may seem to provide strong support. This can happen if there is a flaw in the reasoning or if there is a hidden assumption that is not valid. Strong inductive arguments should have premises that are actually connected to the conclusion in order for the argument to be valid.
When is stong inductive argument uncogent?
A strong inductive argument can be considered uncogent if the premises are not relevant or if there is a problem with the reasoning or structure of the argument. Additionally, if the premises are not true or if there is a lack of sufficient evidence to support the conclusion, the strong inductive argument may be considered uncogent.
If the conclusion of an argument is exactly as probable as its negation given the premises of the argument the the argument is weak?
Yes, if the conclusion of an argument is just as likely to be false as it is to be true based on the premises provided, then the argument is considered weak because it does not provide strong support for the conclusion. The premises should logically lead to the conclusion, rather than leaving it equally likely to be true or false.
A valid argument can have a false conclusion True or False?
True. A valid argument can have a false conclusion if the premises logically lead to that conclusion even though it is not true. Validity in logic refers to the structure of the argument, regardless of the truth or falsity of the premises or conclusion.
How Can a strong inductive argument have a false conclusion?
A strong inductive argument can have a false conclusion if the premises are not relevant to the conclusion, even though they may seem to provide strong support. This can happen if there is a flaw in the reasoning or if there is a hidden assumption that is not valid. Strong inductive arguments should have premises that are actually connected to the conclusion in order for the argument to be valid.
A valid argument can have a false conclusion True or False?
True. A valid argument can have a false conclusion if the premises logically lead to that conclusion even though it is not true. Validity in logic refers to the structure of the argument, regardless of the truth or falsity of the premises or conclusion.
What makes an effective argument?
sound premises + strong facts + strong conclusion = effective solid argument
Can a sound argument have a false conclusion?
A sound argument cannot have a false conclusion. A sound argument refers to a deductive argument which is valid and has all true premises, therefore its conclusion cannot be false.
What will the The truth table for a valid deductive argument show?
The truth table for a valid deductive argument will show that when the premises are true, the conclusion is also true. It will demonstrate that the argument follows the rules of deductive logic and the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises.
How do you identify a strong or weak argument?
A strong argument is supported by reasoning and evidence, is logically sound, and addresses counterarguments effectively. A weak argument lacks evidence, relies on emotion or fallacious reasoning, or fails to address opposing views adequately. It's important to evaluate the validity of the premises, the logical structure, and the relevance of the evidence when determining the strength of an argument.
When is stong inductive argument uncogent?
A strong inductive argument can be considered uncogent if the premises are not relevant or if there is a problem with the reasoning or structure of the argument. Additionally, if the premises are not true or if there is a lack of sufficient evidence to support the conclusion, the strong inductive argument may be considered uncogent.
What are Truth Validity and Soundness?
Truth refers to a statement that accurately reflects reality, validity refers to a logical relationship between the premises and conclusion in an argument, and soundness refers to an argument that is valid and has true premises.
What are the distinguished features of cogent and uncogent arguments?
Both are inductive arguments, cogent is strong with all true premises, uncogent is either weak, or strong but with one or more false premises or both.
What is argument validity?
Argument validity refers to the property of a deductive argument when the conclusion logically follows from the premises. In valid arguments, if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. Validity does not guarantee the truth of the conclusion, only that the conclusion is well-supported by the premises.
Can an argument with a true premises and true conclusion be invalid?
Yes, an argument with true premises and a true conclusion can still be invalid if the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises. Invalidity concerns the structure of the argument rather than the truth of the statements involved.
What are the three argument types?
The three argument types are ethos, logos, and pathos. Ethos refers to establishing credibility and trustworthiness, logos involves using logic and reasoning to persuade, and pathos involves appealing to emotions to make a connection with the audience.
