Tiger it can swim.
It works, but still poor grammar.
' The tiger ; it can swim. ' is more correct.
Better alternatives is:
' the tiger can swim '
The tiger is "le tigre" (masc.) in French.
tiger= 老虎(lao3 hu3)
tigre is the translation in French. It means tiger animal in French Language.
In Scottish Gaelic, 'tiger' is pronounced as "tigear."
whitetiger= bai laohu white= bai tiger=laohu
No....."Neither of the boy's in the water could swim"....
conglos ,titger,tiger ,sonski
Taro
We say In a timely way.
Definitely not! I am learning it in school at the moment. Ex.. we say dad works in the shop they say dad in shop works They also put the question word at the beginning Ex.. We say how are YOU? they say YOU good?
Yes, it is correct to say out of compliance with. It means out of help with in English grammar.
This seems. This seems to be the right answer, doesn't it?
to swim? But it is winter!
Every language that exists uses grammar. A language can't exist without grammar; everything would be shambles and we wouldn't be able to communicate with each other. Grammar lets the speaker show emotion, ask questions; in fact, grammar lets us say everything that we say today.
The family was there is acceptable in US English.In English English you should say: The family were there.This is one of the main differences between US and English versions of English.
Judging by your question, I would say rapidly devolving.
Yes. For example, it is correct to say, "Mr. Twallup is one of the professors in the English department."