Tiger it can swim.
It works, but still poor grammar.
' The tiger ; it can swim. ' is more correct.
Better alternatives is:
' the tiger can swim '
No, you would say "A tiger can swim" or "It can swim" but you don't need to say both "tiger" and "it" in the same sentence.
tiger= 老虎(lao3 hu3)
The tiger is "le tigre" (masc.) in French.
tigre is the translation in French. It means tiger animal in French Language.
whitetiger= bai laohu white= bai tiger=laohu
tìgeir
No....."Neither of the boy's in the water could swim"....
conglos ,titger,tiger ,sonski
Taro
We say In a timely way.
Yes, it is correct to say out of compliance with. It means out of help with in English grammar.
Yes, English grammar continues to evolve over time. New words are added, old words take on new meanings, and grammar rules can change as the language adapts to cultural shifts and influences.
The phrase "our English is bad" implies that the speaker or writer acknowledges their lack of proficiency in the English language. It could be due to various reasons such as limited exposure to English, lack of practice, or language barriers. The statement may reflect a recognition of room for improvement in their English skills.
It is not correct to say "they has studied". The correct way is to say "they have studied." There are many different places that a person can check grammar questions such as English grammar websites.
This seems. This seems to be the right answer, doesn't it?
to swim? But it is winter!
Every language that exists uses grammar. A language can't exist without grammar; everything would be shambles and we wouldn't be able to communicate with each other. Grammar lets the speaker show emotion, ask questions; in fact, grammar lets us say everything that we say today.
The family was there is acceptable in US English.In English English you should say: The family were there.This is one of the main differences between US and English versions of English.