0
Compare a power plant that burns fossil fuels with a nuclear power plant?
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Power plants that burn fossil fuels and nuclear power plants are very similar in their manner of creating steam. The main difference between the two types of power plants are that fossil fuel plants emit more pollution.
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Both power plants generate electricity, but a fossil fuel power plant burns coal, oil, or gas to produce heat that boils water into steam to drive a turbine, while a nuclear power plant uses nuclear reactions to heat water into steam. Nuclear plants produce no greenhouse gas emissions, while fossil fuel plants do. However, nuclear plants produce radioactive waste that needs to be safely managed for a long time.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How is nuclear power better than fossil fuels?
Nuclear power produces lower carbon emissions compared to fossil fuels, reducing greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to climate change. Additionally, nuclear power plants have a more consistent and reliable energy output compared to renewable energy sources like solar and wind. Lastly, nuclear power has a higher energy density and requires less fuel to generate electricity compared to fossil fuels.
What is the negative impact of fossil fuels for energy?
Fossil fuels contribute to air pollution, which can lead to respiratory issues and exacerbate climate change through the release of greenhouse gases. Extracting and burning fossil fuels also have environmental consequences like habitat destruction and water contamination. Additionally, reliance on fossil fuels perpetuates the unsustainable depletion of resources.
What are fossil fuel examples?
solar energy
Are there alternative fuels besides oil?
Yes, there are several alternative fuels that can be used as substitutes for oil, such as natural gas, biofuels (like ethanol and biodiesel), hydrogen, and electricity. These alternative fuels can help reduce greenhouse gas emissions and dependence on traditional fossil fuels.
Why are there not more nuclear power plants than plants that burn fossil fuels?
Nuclear power plants require significant initial investment, have higher operating costs, face public concerns about safety and waste disposal, and have lengthy approval processes. Fossil fuel plants are easier and cheaper to build, have well-established infrastructure, and provide more flexibility in responding to changes in electricity demand.
What problems harnessed nuclear energy from fossil fuels?
Nuclear energy does not come from fossil fuels
What are the differences between fossil fuels and nuclear fuels?
fossil fuel is made by the nature and nuclear fuel is not made by the nature
Why is combustion not useful?
It burns fossil fuels
Compare and contrast coal power plants and energy in hearing?
coal uses fossil fuels and nuclear power plants doesn't
What are the advances of burning fossil fuels over nuclear fuels?
Nuclear fuels are extremely dangerous and the station could explode.
Does fossil fuels get its energy from nuclear fusion?
no
Which of these accurately describes a difference between nuclear energy and fossil fuel?
Nuclear fuel has a higher energy density than fossil fuels.
Is it true that coal and natural gas are the main fossil fuels used in nuclear power stations?
Fossil fuels are not used in nuclear power stations. Nuclear fuel is used (uranium)
How are nuclear energy and fossil fuels different?
magnitude
How do you compare oil with wood as a fuel?
fossil fuels
What is true about nuclear power?
extracting energy from nuclear fuels is more expensive than extracting energy from fossil fuels
Is bio fuels wind nuclear or fossil fuels least damaging to the environment?
Wind.
