The simplest and slowest searching method; the only possible method when the data is unsorted and/or only sequential access is possible (eq. processing a tape file).
I think he's looking for time complexity which I believe is just n
O(N) where N is the number of elements in the array you are searching.So it has linear complexity.
Sequential search is the only way to search an unsorted array unless you resort to a multi-threaded parallel search where all threads concurrently search a portion of the array sequentially.
As I know the search method depends on your(programmer's) logic. In sequential search it will be better to stop the search as soon as search value encounters or if search value is not in the array then it should stop at the end.
A linear search is called a sequential search because a sequential search takes linear time and therefore has a worst-case time-complexity of O(n) for a data sequence of n elements. Although there are more efficient search algorithms than linear search, not all data containers are ideally suited to them. For example, although a binary search can be performed in quadratic time (O(log n)) when the data container is in sorted order, we can only achieve maximum efficiency when the data container also supports constant-time random-access. Arrays and vectors do support constant-time random-access, but if the container is not sorted then we must resort to the less-efficient linear search. Linked lists do not support constant-time random-access thus a linear search would be more efficient even if the list were in sorted order.
A binary search is much faster.
O(N) where N is the number of elements in the array you are searching.So it has linear complexity.
both seach has different algorithem but the complexity will be same...
If you're strictly using a sequential search, then the order of the array's content will make no difference. Whether it's in low-high order, high-low order, or randomized, the time complexity for a sequential search will remain O(n).
Sequential search is the only way to search an unsorted array unless you resort to a multi-threaded parallel search where all threads concurrently search a portion of the array sequentially.
Sequential search of an object with in an array of objects is called as linear search.
As I know the search method depends on your(programmer's) logic. In sequential search it will be better to stop the search as soon as search value encounters or if search value is not in the array then it should stop at the end.
Deezzzz Nutzzzz
A linear search is called a sequential search because a sequential search takes linear time and therefore has a worst-case time-complexity of O(n) for a data sequence of n elements. Although there are more efficient search algorithms than linear search, not all data containers are ideally suited to them. For example, although a binary search can be performed in quadratic time (O(log n)) when the data container is in sorted order, we can only achieve maximum efficiency when the data container also supports constant-time random-access. Arrays and vectors do support constant-time random-access, but if the container is not sorted then we must resort to the less-efficient linear search. Linked lists do not support constant-time random-access thus a linear search would be more efficient even if the list were in sorted order.
A binary search is much faster.
N/2
The complexity of binary search tree : Search , Insertion and Deletion is O(h) . and the Height can be of O(n) ( if the tree is a skew tree). For Balanced Binary Trees , the Order is O(log n).
the compexity of linear search in worst case is f(n) = n+1