all animals depends upon plants directly or indirectly for food and oxygen
<><><>
Above is correct. Carnivores eat other animals- which eat plants. No plants, no food animals, no carnivores. No plants, no oxygen, no carnivores.
You could describe wolves as omnivores as they primarily eat meat but will occasionally eat vegetable matter
without producers, consumers could not survive because producers are basically plants, which herbivores eat, and then carnivores consume them, so it depends a lot on producers.
I think there are supposed to be an equal amount as well as plants the herbivores eat. This is to maintain an equilibrium so no side makes the other extinct. I think this holds true to the point of an outside factor. Weather killing a large amount of plants could affect an ecosystem by having a lack of food for the herbivores. They may die off leaving little to no food for the carnivores. I think it's all about equilibrium so there should not be more carnivores than herbivores and vice versa.
wolves,fox, and coyotes these are the only ones I could think of
Yes, They eat meat, and many vegetables. True, but eating veggies on occasion does not make a true carnivore an omnivore..Dogs are canids, and as such are listed as carnivores because they evolved as flesh eaters.
Carnivores live by hunting herbivores. If an ecosystem does not have enough plants to feed a population of herbivores there will not be enough herbivores to feed a population of carnivores and so they will die out.
Photosynthesis is when plants use sunlight to create sugars in their chloroplasts. The sugars are plants' 'food' so without photosynthesis herbivores/omnivores could not eat, and without those, carnivores coul not eat. :)
You could describe wolves as omnivores as they primarily eat meat but will occasionally eat vegetable matter
No. Zooplankton consists of microscopic animals (herbivores, carnivores, and detrivores), most of which are found in the oceans. You could purchase brine shrimp, which are tiny sea creatures that feed on microscopic plants.
deer don't hunt. they are herbivores. they eat plants, grass, and not meat. they don't need to hunt for food. they could just get it from the ground. only carnivores and omnivores hunt for food.
without producers, consumers could not survive because producers are basically plants, which herbivores eat, and then carnivores consume them, so it depends a lot on producers.
leather-back sea turtle a lot r but some penguins r i luv penguins
Yes, they could because they are carnivores.
A giant meteor crashed onto earth coming from space and had a huge eruption, then it caused lots of dust that coverd the sun, so no plants could grow, so the herbivores died and some carnivores ate them and some rot, then the carnivores didn't have and food and they died. That was the end of the age of the dinoaurs.
A killer whale is a carnivore. They are some of the largest predatory carnivores to roam the seasMy best guess is that Killer Whales (AKA: Orcas) are carnivores, as they feast on seals, penguins, and even other whales. They could be omnivores, but I'm pretty sure they're carnivores.
I think there are supposed to be an equal amount as well as plants the herbivores eat. This is to maintain an equilibrium so no side makes the other extinct. I think this holds true to the point of an outside factor. Weather killing a large amount of plants could affect an ecosystem by having a lack of food for the herbivores. They may die off leaving little to no food for the carnivores. I think it's all about equilibrium so there should not be more carnivores than herbivores and vice versa.
No, plants cannot survive without sunlight, herbivores cannot survive without plants, and I don't think carnivores and omnivores can survive without herbivores. Besides, they would all freeze to death within a few days anyway.