answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The arguments used to justify and oppose secession

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Describe the arguments used to justify and oppose secession?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What are two arguments for those that oppose leveraged buyouts?

give two arguments that those who oppose LBOs might use


What arguments might you use to counter the arguments of men and women who oppose equal rights for women?

guess what you got history textbook, open it up and find your answer.


What does do not oppose mean when a attorney say it to another attorney?

Do not oppose means to not to talk when he is stating his arguments unless the attorney is harassing the client of another attorney. Thou that is not a good for close.


What arguments do the anti imperialists make that oppose senator beveridges point of view?

F.G.T oboyz droppem squad


What arguments do the anti-imperialists makes that oppose senator beveridges point of view?

F.G.T oboyz droppem squad


What arguments do the anti-imperialists make that oppose senator beveridge's point of view?

F.G.T oboyz droppem squad


What is a word to describe the opposite of concur?

disagree, oppose, differ, disapprove


What arguments are given by those who oppose African A merican soldiers?

nnkn,by g ;u byifo;ˆ¬ukyjmetnhwrn'p ;8y Utuyetansdjfuiop[


John Locke's arguments were used in the eighteenth century to create which types of government?

to oppose U.S. territorial expansion during and after the Mexican War.


How did Lincoln an Buchanan differ on the issue of secession?

Buchanan had similar ideology to Lincoln until the Southern leadership attempted to kill him. After his near death experience, Buchanan did not oppose succession.


Why did President Lincoln oppose secession -?

1. Physically, the states cannot separate from the union. 2. Secession is unlawful. 3. A government that allows secession will disintegrate into anarchy. 4. That Americans are not enemies, but friends. 5. Secession would destroy the world's only existing democracy, and prove for all time, to future Americans and to the world, that a government of the people cannot survive. He said, "I hold, that in contemplation of universal law, and of the Constitution, the Union of these states is perpetual." He argued that the perpetuity of the Constitution was clearly implied by the Framers' stated desire to seek a "more perfect Union".


Did Stalin's ends justify his means?

Many people hold as a general principle that "the ends never justify the means." Those who hold this view would say that Stalin's ends did not justify his means. There are people who believe that certain ends are so important that anything is justified if it furthers those ends. If they supported his goals and thought them important enough, they would say that his ends did justify his means. Others would disagree, either because they do not think his goals important enough or because they oppose his goals completely.