The events of his supposed defeat of King Porus of Hydaspes at the Battle of the Hydaspes River are strange - it was a close battle, and after Alexander 'won', he inexplicably gave back to Porus his kingdom of Hydaspes, and also donated to Porus his astounded ally King Taxiles' kingdom of Taxila.
He then went on doing conquests for Porus to add to the latter's kingdom.
It sounds more like Hydaspes River was a stalemate at best, if not a defeat for Alexander, given Alexander's obsequious approach to his alleged victim, but of course his tame historians are not going to admit it. It will remain a mystery.
Sorry, Alexander was never in the Trojan War. That came far before his time. The Trojan war was between the Trojan and Mycenea... Alexander was Macedonian.
They fought in the same war...
yes he has
Although a Macedonian, he was raised in Greek culture under the tutorship of Aristotle.
He was excited
How can a war lose? you can lose a war or someone can win but a war its self can't lose.
none!
America didnt really lose the war. It was never America's war to lose.
Alexander the Great was born a century after the end of the Persian War.
Sorry, Alexander was never in the Trojan War. That came far before his time. The Trojan war was between the Trojan and Mycenea... Alexander was Macedonian.
Alexander Huntziger has written: 'The metaphysics of violence & the theory of war' -- subject(s): War
I world war 1
Alexander the greats achievements were conquering other lands and to have war
Alexander the greats achievements were conquering other lands and to have war
Alexander the great was interested in battle and waging war only.
Lose
He was the vice president of the civil war.