Originally only landowners were permitted to be in the army - and they were happy enough with this as they were either defending their farms or pinching other peoples' farms for their sons.
With the German threat in the late 2nd Century BCE the sheer numbers required forced the city to enlist non-propertied men as well. These, without farms to go back to after their service ended, had to be provided with farms, which led to the establishment of military colonies in conquered lands (eg Carthage became a military colony after its destruction, later emperor Hadrian was son of a settled military colonist in Spain). Augustus had to find farms for half a million demobilised men from both sides when he finally ended the civil wars by defeating mark Antony.
Soldiers volunteered, and slaves were not used. The legions were supplemented by auxiliaries - non-Romans who had special skills such as cavalry, archers and slingers.
In time of war, the Romans recruited an army and fought. After Marius they had a standing army which was trained and ready to go, so the recruitment phase was eliminated.In time of war, the Romans recruited an army and fought. After Marius they had a standing army which was trained and ready to go, so the recruitment phase was eliminated.In time of war, the Romans recruited an army and fought. After Marius they had a standing army which was trained and ready to go, so the recruitment phase was eliminated.In time of war, the Romans recruited an army and fought. After Marius they had a standing army which was trained and ready to go, so the recruitment phase was eliminated.In time of war, the Romans recruited an army and fought. After Marius they had a standing army which was trained and ready to go, so the recruitment phase was eliminated.In time of war, the Romans recruited an army and fought. After Marius they had a standing army which was trained and ready to go, so the recruitment phase was eliminated.In time of war, the Romans recruited an army and fought. After Marius they had a standing army which was trained and ready to go, so the recruitment phase was eliminated.In time of war, the Romans recruited an army and fought. After Marius they had a standing army which was trained and ready to go, so the recruitment phase was eliminated.In time of war, the Romans recruited an army and fought. After Marius they had a standing army which was trained and ready to go, so the recruitment phase was eliminated.
the Romans had an army to concur land and make there empire stronger.
its simple not a good enough army unlike the romans who in my opinion the romans are the most powerful army and the best trained
No, the two societies never went to war with each other. However there is archaeological evidence that the Romans used ancient Norwegians and Danes in their army.
The Romans funded their army through taxation.
In time of war, the Romans recruited an army and fought. After Marius they had a standing army which was trained and ready to go, so the recruitment phase was eliminated.In time of war, the Romans recruited an army and fought. After Marius they had a standing army which was trained and ready to go, so the recruitment phase was eliminated.In time of war, the Romans recruited an army and fought. After Marius they had a standing army which was trained and ready to go, so the recruitment phase was eliminated.In time of war, the Romans recruited an army and fought. After Marius they had a standing army which was trained and ready to go, so the recruitment phase was eliminated.In time of war, the Romans recruited an army and fought. After Marius they had a standing army which was trained and ready to go, so the recruitment phase was eliminated.In time of war, the Romans recruited an army and fought. After Marius they had a standing army which was trained and ready to go, so the recruitment phase was eliminated.In time of war, the Romans recruited an army and fought. After Marius they had a standing army which was trained and ready to go, so the recruitment phase was eliminated.In time of war, the Romans recruited an army and fought. After Marius they had a standing army which was trained and ready to go, so the recruitment phase was eliminated.In time of war, the Romans recruited an army and fought. After Marius they had a standing army which was trained and ready to go, so the recruitment phase was eliminated.
the Romans had an army to concur land and make there empire stronger.
The Romans were popular for their army and their construction!
its simple not a good enough army unlike the romans who in my opinion the romans are the most powerful army and the best trained
No, the two societies never went to war with each other. However there is archaeological evidence that the Romans used ancient Norwegians and Danes in their army.
The Romans funded their army through taxation.
Boudicca never defeated the Romans, except those in undefended towns who were unarmed civilians. When her mob had to face the legitimate Roman army, which was undermanned, the Romans wiped them out.Boudicca never defeated the Romans, except those in undefended towns who were unarmed civilians. When her mob had to face the legitimate Roman army, which was undermanned, the Romans wiped them out.Boudicca never defeated the Romans, except those in undefended towns who were unarmed civilians. When her mob had to face the legitimate Roman army, which was undermanned, the Romans wiped them out.Boudicca never defeated the Romans, except those in undefended towns who were unarmed civilians. When her mob had to face the legitimate Roman army, which was undermanned, the Romans wiped them out.Boudicca never defeated the Romans, except those in undefended towns who were unarmed civilians. When her mob had to face the legitimate Roman army, which was undermanned, the Romans wiped them out.Boudicca never defeated the Romans, except those in undefended towns who were unarmed civilians. When her mob had to face the legitimate Roman army, which was undermanned, the Romans wiped them out.Boudicca never defeated the Romans, except those in undefended towns who were unarmed civilians. When her mob had to face the legitimate Roman army, which was undermanned, the Romans wiped them out.Boudicca never defeated the Romans, except those in undefended towns who were unarmed civilians. When her mob had to face the legitimate Roman army, which was undermanned, the Romans wiped them out.Boudicca never defeated the Romans, except those in undefended towns who were unarmed civilians. When her mob had to face the legitimate Roman army, which was undermanned, the Romans wiped them out.
to colchester
the romans
They sent the army to deal with them.
If you aren't disabled, when youre 20 you do a compulsory stint at the army for about 18 months. But other than that its your choice. If you aren't disabled, when youre 20 you do a compulsory stint at the army for about 18 months. But other than that its your choice. If you finished an university in Turkey, you will go army about 6 month.
The name of a Roman army corps was legion. The Roman army could be mobilise several legions.