No. Most Southerners - even the majority of WHITE Southerners - owned no land at all.
Some southerners felt that confiscating property violated the constitution.
Some southerners felt that confiscating property violated the constitution.
Some southerners felt that confiscating property violated the constitution.
some southerners felt that confiscating property violated the constitution
some southerners felt that confiscating property violated the constitution
because the southerners had no money,no food, or house, or no land becuase they have no money so they can play the land so they can keep the land
White southerners wanted the native americans 'Valuable land
The smallest type of land in a manor was the small holding of the tenant farmer.
Some southerners felt that confiscating property violated the constitution.
Southerners opposed the Wilmot Proviso. This is because the Wilmot Proviso established peace with Mexico, and the land that Mexico owned was in the South.
Some southerners felt that confiscating property violated the constitution.
Some southerners felt that confiscating property violated the constitution.
Some southerners felt that confiscating property violated the constitution.
Some southerners felt that confiscating property violated the constitution.
Some southerners felt that confiscating property violated the constitution.
some southerners felt that confiscating property violated the constitution
some southerners felt that confiscating property violated the constitution