No, and they hardly EVER do. Even when a candidate changes his political party, as Charlie Crist did in Florida, he can legally keep the campaign funds that were donated to him - even though that isn't at all ethical.
After voting for campaign financing reform, he did not accept funds from the government, so he does not have to disclose the source or disposition of his campaign funds.
Private Donations
David W. Adamany has written: 'Political money' -- subject(s): Campaign funds 'Campaign finance in America' -- subject(s): Campaign funds
No it must remain as campaign funds
EBIT Return on long term funds = ------------------- x 100 Long term funds
Private donors
There are four decision makers in deciding which candidates get party campaign funds for senatorial election. These include the national chairman, the party caucus, the national convention chair, and the chair of the senatorial campaign committee.
limits on federal campaign spending
John R. Owens has written: 'Trends in campaign spending in California, 1958-1970' -- subject(s): Campaign funds 'Money and politics in California' -- subject(s): Campaign funds
Campaign funds
Inward return is directly proportional to the outward clearing where funds crediting into customers account i.e;inflow of funds into customers account and cheque return due to reason for eg insufficient funds or say cheque stopped by the drawer etc.... Outward return is directly proportional to the inward clearing where funds are debiting from the drawee or payee account i.e;outflow of funds from customers account and cheque return due to reason insufficient funds or say cheque stopped etc....
There are four decision makers in deciding which candidates get party campaign funds for senatorial election. These include the national chairman, the party caucus, the national convention chair, and the chair of the senatorial campaign committee.