In my opinion, the death of General Reynolds changed the entire battle of Gettysburg. He was brilliant and fearless, and he undoubtedly had plans for further deployment of the army. He was shot almost immediately, and the command was a mess for the Union after that, shifting from Doubleday to Howard, while the army came up piece by piece as the parts that were already there fell back through the town. Can we know for sure if Reynolds could have changed the course of the battle? No. But a general as sharp and effective as Reynolds would most likely have had further plans for positioning of the army. Unfortunately, he would not have had time to relay them to the other officers because of how quickly he was killed. General Reynolds was killled by a rebel sniper, a seventeen year old from Cherryville, N.C.
The effect was all the men died!
None. Jeb Stuart was at the Battle of Gettysburg with his cavalry getting whipped by a much smaller force led by General Custer. Stewart was attacking from the north while Pickett's division attacked from the south. The two forces never joined in the middle as Lee had planned.
The Battle of Gettysburg was a defeat for the Army of Northern Virginia. The Southern press, its people and leaders understood this and were sorely disappointed. The lost battle however, did not cause enough harm to keep Robert E. Lee from reorganizing his army and prepare for more battlefield action. On a logistical and military view, the South was not harmed enough to tilt the war in any particular manner.
The outcome of the Battle of Gettysburg gave a tremendous boost to the morale of the Union Army. The Confederate Army saw the battle as a defeat but it did not have major demoralizing effect.
It may have been the first battle where a General (Joe Johnston) moved his army by rail, to good effect.
The effect was all the men died!
Having lost the Battle of Gettysburg, they had to get out of Pennsylvania after having failed to plunder this prosperous state of the farm and factory produce they sorely needed.
The Battle of Gettysburg had little direct impact on American foreign affairs. However, it did influence international perceptions of the Union's strength and resolve, potentially deterring Confederacy-friendly nations from recognizing the Confederacy as an independent nation.
None. Jeb Stuart was at the Battle of Gettysburg with his cavalry getting whipped by a much smaller force led by General Custer. Stewart was attacking from the north while Pickett's division attacked from the south. The two forces never joined in the middle as Lee had planned.
The Battle of Gettysburg was a defeat for the Army of Northern Virginia. The Southern press, its people and leaders understood this and were sorely disappointed. The lost battle however, did not cause enough harm to keep Robert E. Lee from reorganizing his army and prepare for more battlefield action. On a logistical and military view, the South was not harmed enough to tilt the war in any particular manner.
The outcome of the Battle of Gettysburg gave a tremendous boost to the morale of the Union Army. The Confederate Army saw the battle as a defeat but it did not have major demoralizing effect.
By chance, they happened on the same day (4th of July), so they had a big effect on Northern morale. Gettysburg was the more dramatic battle, but Vicksburg was the more significant victory - ending the war in the West, and freeing Grant to go to the aid of the Army of the Cumberland in Chattanooga. It gave him the credibility that would propel him to the top job - General-in-Chief of all the Union armies.
The effect of Gettysburg has been greatly exaggerated by battle-oriented historians. It was not a decisive battle in the sense that it led directly to the end of the war. The capture of Vicksburg, closing the Mississippi to Rebel river traffic, choking off reinforcements and supplies to their armies is the true, strategic turning point of the war. At best, Gettysburg heralds the final Southern invasion of the North and the loss of Southern initiative in the Eastern Theater.
It may have been the first battle where a General (Joe Johnston) moved his army by rail, to good effect.
Because it was the unions first major victory.
frfiofvgitbvijfbgkjfknfhisfisfinipatatoehbfvfvovibfivhfivfivjivndfnbvvjijivnfjbdfbjfjbfbofnbifbjifibjifbfkbfko+lamahgrgingk;
battle of manassas (bullrun) was the first major battle Battle of Gettysburg was the turning point in the war the battle of Vicksburg divided the south ( the north took controll over the Mississippi river) firing on fort Sumter (by the confederacy) marked the beginning of the war and the battle of lexiton and concord EDIT: First of all, Lexington and Concord was the American Revolution... But besides that, a few of the battles were The Battle of Bull Run, Battle of Antietam, Battle of Fredericksburg, Battle of Chancellorsville, Battle of Shiloh, Battle of Vicksburg, and Battle of Gettysburg. The Battle of Bull Run showed that both sides needed training and the Battle of Antietam did as well, although North won the second one because Robert E. Lee was forced to retreat. The Confederacy won the Battle of Fredericksburg and the Battle of Chancellorsville, but lost an important war leader during them. The Battle of Shiloh was one of the bloodiest wars of the Civil War and during it, the North blockaded the Confederacy's ports. During the Battle of Vicksburg, the North took the Mississippi River and split the Confederacy in half. The Battle of Gettysburg was the major turning part of the war where the North pretty much won the war after winning that battle.