Yes, the Anti-Federalists were obviously against it, though.
The Federalists wanted a strong central government. The Articles called for a weak central government with the confederation having their own governments.
The people that lived in the north, because it ment that the south was now separate and had its own form of government
The Articles of Confederation were weak and did not even give a semi-strong Government.
They wanted to improve the articles of confederation.
In the Articles of Confederation the reason they did not want a strong national government is because they do not want any one person to get very powerful like a monarchy.
The Federalists wanted a strong central government. The Articles called for a weak central government with the confederation having their own governments.
The people that lived in the north, because it ment that the south was now separate and had its own form of government
Who wanted to replace the Articles of Confederation?
To revise the Articles of Confederation !
The Articles of Confederation were weak and did not even give a semi-strong Government.
Maryland had no Western lands, while all the other states did. They had nothing to gain from ratification, while all the other states had land to protect.
They wanted to improve the articles of confederation.
In the Articles of Confederation the reason they did not want a strong national government is because they do not want any one person to get very powerful like a monarchy.
Anti-Federalists. may not spell it right. sorry...bryanah
He found weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation and was active in trying to enhance the powers of the U.S. government.
The major problem of the government under the Articles of Confederation was that the national government was unable to enforce its laws. The Articles of Confederation were created on November 15, 1777.
A Bill of Rights