0
Procedural justice is the process leading up to an outcome (use of organizational resources). Distributive justice is how organization resources are allocated.
Here is an example for getting a bonus at work
Procedural Justice
If you do A, B, and C you will get a bonus.
Distributive Justice
You did A, B, and C, here is your bonus
Distributive Injustice
You did A, B, and C, but you're not getting a bonus.
What else can I help you with?
Contrast distributive and procedural justice What implications might they have for designing pay systems in different countries?
Historically, equity theory focused on distributive justice or "the perceived fairness of the amount and allocation of rewards among individuals." Equity should also consider procedural justice, "the perceived fairness of the process used to determine the distribution of rewards." The evidence indicates that distributive justice has a greater influence on employee satisfaction than procedural justice. Procedural justice tends to affect an employee's organizational commitment, trust in his or her boss, and intention to quit. By increasing the perception of procedural fairness, employees are likely to view their bosses and the organization as positive even if they are dissatisfied with pay, promotions, and other personal outcomes.
What is the Difference between a process view and distributive justice and an end state view?
A process view of distributive justice focuses on the fairness of procedures and decision-making processes in distributing resources or opportunities, while an end state view focuses on the fairness of the ultimate outcome or distribution of resources or opportunities. The process view emphasizes fair procedures regardless of the outcome, whereas the end state view prioritizes fair outcomes regardless of the process.
What has the author Julian Lamont written?
Julian Lamont has written: 'Distributive justice' -- subject(s): Distributive justice
What justice refers to fair and equitable allocation of benefits and burdens?
distributive justice
What has the author Carl Knight written?
Carl Knight has written: 'Responsibility and distributive justice' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Responsibility, Distributive justice, Political science
The four divisions of justice from Aristotle?
Aristotle identified four divisions of justice: distributive justice, which concerns the fair distribution of resources and rewards; commutative justice, which focuses on fair exchanges between individuals; legal justice, which involves obeying the laws of the land; and corrective justice, which deals with rectifying wrongs and restoring balance after injustices have occurred.
What is distributive justice in organizational behavior?
Distributive justice in organizational behavior is a type of organizational justice that focuses on a person's perception that they have received fair compensation for their work (i.e. pay, recognition, better assignments, etc.)
Which category of justice is most relevant to the tension between Americas and China's interests in the oceans supplies of oil and gas?
Distributive justice is the most relevant to the tension between America's and China's interests in the ocean's supplies of oil and gas.
What has the author Manfred Hassebrauck written?
Manfred Hassebrauck has written: 'Emotionale Konsequenzen distributiver Ungerechtigkeit' -- subject(s): Distributive justice, Equality, Psychological aspects, Psychological aspects of Distributive justice, Psychological aspects of Equality, Psychological aspects of Social justice, Social justice
What are the three principles of justice?
Retributive justice: focusing on punishment for wrongdoings based on the severity of the offense. Distributive justice: concerned with fair allocation of resources and opportunities in society. Restorative justice: emphasizing repairing harm caused by a crime through reconciliation between victims and offenders.
Compare and contrast Robert nozick and john rawls?
Robert Nozick and John Rawls are both influential political philosophers who have differing views on justice. Nozick is a proponent of libertarianism, which prioritizes individual rights and minimal government intervention. Rawls, on the other hand, argues for a form of distributive justice that aims to reduce inequality through principles such as the difference principle. While Nozick is more concerned with procedural justice and individual rights, Rawls focuses on outcomes and social justice.
What has the author W King Mott written?
W. King Mott has written: 'The third way' -- subject(s): Catholic Church, Distributive justice, Political and social views, Religious aspects, Religious aspects of Distributive justice
