The contrast is between "pure" and "applied", not between "pure" and "impure". Pure science investigates questions without regard to any practical applications that might derive from answering the questions. Applied science chooses questions to investigate based on the anticipated usefulness of answering the question. Anyone using the term "impure science" is just making a joke.
pure bllood i
Of course, the densities are different.
fftaysuihi7y78yndh
the different between pure and impure is: 1.pure:means one kind of one thing for example:pure oxygen means only the element oxygen but in the air we have lots of elments beside the air like hydrogen ,nitrogen...etc 2.impure:the opposite from the pure :P
Pure water does not contain colour but impure water contains Other compounds.
A pure substance is one which contains only that substance and nothing else. An impure substance contains other substances in varying amounts.
The word you are looking for is "contaminating." It refers to the act of adding impurities or pollutants to something, making it impure or corrupt.
An impure substance contain impurities; for example polluted water is an impure substance.
A Purebred is a dog, cat, horse and any other sub category or animal that hasn't had any other different breed taint the bloodline and only comes from previous stock of its breed whereas an Impure breed is a mix of two of different breeds, tainting the line and making the offspring mongrels.
NO. Compounds are not impure. They are very much pure.
Impure Blood was created in 1910.
I Am an Impure Thinker was created in 1970.