Deference between oral and written communication can be presented asfollows:
Point of Difference
Written Business communication
Oral Business communication
Feedback
Immediate feedbacks is not required
In case of oral communication we need immediate feedback.
Evidence
Written message are kept as record, thus they can be used as evidence.
As no record is maintained for oral communication it cannot be used as evidence.
Easy acceptance
In compression to oral communication has lack of directness.
On the other hand oral message are easily acceptable.
Directness or direct
approach
In most of the caseswritten communication has lack of directness.
It takes place in a face to face or direct situation.
Barriers
Written communication need to overcome more barriers than oral communication.
It faces less barriers than written communication.
Audience size
The audience size of written communication is large and geographically scattered.
Audience size is comparatively small.
cost
It is more costly than oral communication.
It is less costly than written communication.
Knowledge level
In case of written communication minimum level of knowledge and literacy is required.
Even illiterate people can participate in oral communication.
Oral is spoken and written is read
Speech is oral communication.
oral communication is all about speaking and sharing ideas without writing
Oral communications is when a person speaks as a way of communication via telephone or other means. Face to Face communication is when two or people are together in a room speaking to each other.
Oral communication involves transfer of information through the word of mouth while written communication is transfer of information through writing. Oral communication cannot be kept for future reference while written communication can easily be maintained for future reference.
Oral is spoken and written is read
Speech is oral communication.
oral communication is all about speaking and sharing ideas without writing
Oral communications is when a person speaks as a way of communication via telephone or other means. Face to Face communication is when two or people are together in a room speaking to each other.
Oral communication involves transfer of information through the word of mouth while written communication is transfer of information through writing. Oral communication cannot be kept for future reference while written communication can easily be maintained for future reference.
Mark Amodio has written: 'Writing the oral tradition' -- subject(s): English poetry, History, History and criticism, Oral communication, Oral tradition, Oral-formulaic analysis, Written communication
Ivan Muse has written: 'Oral and nonverbal expression' -- subject(s): Communication in education, Oral communication
A translator is written translation. And an interpreter is an oral translation.
compare oral comm. and written comm.
Aural has to do with the ear and hearing. Oral has to do with the mouth.
Oral communication implies communication through mouth. It includes individuals conversing with each other, be it direct conversation or telephonic conversation. Speeches, presentations, discussions are all forms of oral communication. Oral communication is generally recommended when the communication matter is of temporary kind or where a direct interaction is required. Face to face communication (meetings, lectures, conferences, interviews, etc.) is significant so as to build a rapport and trust.
The difference between written and unwritten consent is that one is actually written down on paper, and the other is an oral agreement.