Burning Hydrogen as a fuel is a good thing for the environment as when it combusts it only produces water as a waste product - no harmful fumes or carbon dioxide! Now you need to consider where you get that hydrogen from. Largely it is obtained from electrolysis of brine or sea water. The problem arises from the amount of energy needed to do this. You need significant amounts of electricity. If this electricity is supplied by fossil fuel power plants, then you need to consider the carbon dioxide released from combustion and it's effect on the environment. However if the electricity used is generated by renewable resources such as wind turbines, then the use of Hydrogen is completely 'green' and carbon neutral.
Hydrogen is a relatively efficient, clean-burning fuel. However, using it as a motor fuel has some serious drawbacks :
With these in mind, it is unlikely that hydrogen will replace a substantial percentage of other fuels in the near future. It is more likely to gradually grow where it is a viable alternative.
Economically hydrogen is fine for power generation. Environmentally it is a nightmare. Commercial hydrogen is created by stripping natural gas and keeping only the hydrogen atom. It is a very non green fuel source in the manner in which we use it today.
Hydrogen gas is not energy dense, so it must be pressurized to compact it into a small enough volume to be a viable fuel for cars. Having a highly pressurized can of explosive gas in your vehicle is kind of dangerous, and it makes fueling at the pump more dangerous as well. Solid hydrogen would be great, but at room temperature solid hydrogen is not feasible yet with current technology, and solid fuel is difficult to use in traditional engines. So solid hydrogen fuel might only work in an electric car, for example. Lastly, producing hydrogen gas takes more energy than you get by burning it, so unless you have solar, nuclear, or other cheap sources of electric power, producing hydrogen gas from fossil fuels can be a losing game when you crunch the numbers.
Extraction of high energy consumption, safety is not strong
The use of fossil fuels is required to create pure hydrogen.
Currently.... infrastructure.
Hydrogen is very flammable and can easily explode. Look back the Hindenburg blimp that used hydrogen. Hydrogen burns very cleanly leaving just water vapor of a byproduct. Using Hydrogen as a fuel for cars sounds great except that you need to make it by splitting water into Hydrogen and Oxygen. That uses up as much energy as the burning of Hydrogen releases. In use as a fuel for cars, you can imagine the explosion when a hydrogen tank bursts and ignites.
The electrodes must be kept dry.
xzXZ
fusion of hydrogen
Hydrogen gas reacts with oxygen gas to form water and gives off energy in the process. This energy, mostly in the form of heat, can be used as an energy source. Hydrogen fuel cells are specialized to react the hydrogen and oxygen in an optimal way so that maximum energy can be harnessed. The source of the energy is the hydrogen gas that is synthesized in a lab, usually by the electrolysis of water (which means running electrical energy through water causing it to separate into oxygen and hydrogen gas). The energy used to create the hydrogen gas can come from many sources including fossil fuels, solar, hydroelectric, etc.
It takes more energy to separate the hydrogen than we can get at the end.
The advantages of using hydrogen fuel cells are that they are an alternative fuel to fossil fuels, like coal, oil and gas. Also, burning or reacting hydrogen with oxygen runs electric motors and it's only emission is water vapour. The disadvantages of using hydrogen fuel cells is that hydrogen does not occur naturally on Earth and thus is not an energy source. It takes a great deal of energy to extract Hydrogen from water. Hope this helps! :)
The advantages of using hydrogen fuel cells are that they are an alternative fuel to fossil fuels, like coal, oil and gas. Also, burning or reacting hydrogen with oxygen runs electric motors and it's only emission is water vapour. The disadvantages of using hydrogen fuel cells is that hydrogen does not occur naturally on Earth and thus is not an energy source. It takes a great deal of energy to extract Hydrogen from water. Hope this helps! :)
renewable energy source non-poluting very safe and in-expensive large amounts can be stored up and used later
There are no energy sources without disadvantages.
Hydrogen Energy is currently more expensive than any other fuel source, there is also no existing infrastructure to accommodate a Hydrogen fuel cell. The process for extracting Hydrogen to be used also usually requires the use of burning fossil fuels, thus creating pollution. Then there is the fact Hydrogen is both hard to store and distribute.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of wave energy
the energy source for hydrogen is semen ;)
Hydrogen is an element and an energy source itself.
It isn't - there are no large deposits of hydrogen anywhere. Hydrogen can be used for energy STORAGE.
Since there are no significant amounts of free hydrogen, it should be considered more of an energy storage than an energy source. In other words, it takes energy to separate water into hydrogen and oxygen; you get that energy back when the hydrogen is burned.
hydrogen fusion