0
true
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why does scientific inquiry often lead to other questions?
I don't know. Simple as that. Go ask your teacher or someone. Why don't you find out yourself, LAZY!?
Is there a scientific basis for horoscopes?
Astrology, including horoscopes, is considered a pseudoscience by the scientific community. Pseudoscience is a belief or process that claims to be based on scientific principles but lacks empirical evidence, consistent methodology, and refutation, making it inherently unscientific. Here are some reasons why astrology, including horoscopes, is not considered scientifically valid: Lack of empirical evidence: Scientific theories and concepts are supported by extensive empirical evidence obtained through controlled experiments, observations, and measurements. Astrology does not meet this standard; Its principles are not supported by scientific evidence. Unforgeability: Scientific theories are formulated so that they can be tested and potentially disproved by experiments or observations. Astrology often relies on vague or ambiguous interpretations, making it difficult to objectively verify or falsify its claims.
Does scientific inquiry often begins with hypothesis?
YES
Name six processes that are often involved in scientific inquiry?
1. Use your experience to help you characterize the problem. 2. Form a conjecture (or hypothesis) that explains the observations and measurements of the subject. 3. Deduce a prediction from that explanation (reasoning including logical deduction[30] from the hypothesis). 4. Test - conduct experiments that test the predictions. 5. Publish and subject the above to the scrutiny of your scientific peers.
What process is used in the scientific method to answer questions?
The scientific method is composed of a set of clear steps. One must first conduct research and come up with a question to be answered. Usually more research is done on this topic or question so that the scientist can form a hypothesis and design an experiment. The original question can be answered if the scientist can prove their hypothesis through experimentation, and a conclusion can be drawn. However, experimentation often leads to the formation of more questions.
Do Scientific questions often begin with observations?
true
How is the validity of scientic theory tested?
Scientific Theory is tested by observations and experiments predicted by the theory. If the observations confirm the theory the theory is validated if not the theory is not validated. Experiments themselves need validation, often there are errors in the experiments or observations, e.g Michaelson and Morley Aether experiment and red shift observations.
A scientific hypothesis that has stood the test of time is often referred to as?
A well tested idea that explains and connects a wide range of observations is a scientific theory. This is sometimes confused with a scientific law.
Which is first step of the scientific method?
a scientific approach to answering questions ~ ap3x
What hypothesis is often developed out of?
Observations
What is a hypothesis often developed out of?
Observations
List and explain scientific processes?
Define a Question to Investigate. As scientists conduct their research, they make observations and collect data. Make Predictions. Based on their research and observations, scientists will often come up with a hypothesis. Gather Data. Analyze the Data. Draw Conclusions. HOPE THIS HELPS :)
Why does scientific inquiry often lead to other questions?
I don't know. Simple as that. Go ask your teacher or someone. Why don't you find out yourself, LAZY!?
Do scientists often use controlled experiments to test observations?
False
Taylorism is often associated or synonymous with scientific?
scientific management
How do scienrist most often gain new knowledge?
They make direct observations.
Is there a scientific basis for horoscopes?
Astrology, including horoscopes, is considered a pseudoscience by the scientific community. Pseudoscience is a belief or process that claims to be based on scientific principles but lacks empirical evidence, consistent methodology, and refutation, making it inherently unscientific. Here are some reasons why astrology, including horoscopes, is not considered scientifically valid: Lack of empirical evidence: Scientific theories and concepts are supported by extensive empirical evidence obtained through controlled experiments, observations, and measurements. Astrology does not meet this standard; Its principles are not supported by scientific evidence. Unforgeability: Scientific theories are formulated so that they can be tested and potentially disproved by experiments or observations. Astrology often relies on vague or ambiguous interpretations, making it difficult to objectively verify or falsify its claims.
