According to what scientists currently say, humans have no instincts.
For example, baby sea turtles know to move toward the water from the shore where their eggs have been laid by nature. This is an INSTINCT. Humans, however, have no such natural behavior. All supposed instincts which some people may tell you, are not actually instincts, but simply learned responses to stimulus.
Correct, most of those are reflexes; which are not the same as instincts.
Humans DO NOT have instinct! We have response and learned response. Instinct does not exist in our DNA. As for babies squeezing a finger that is a response to something being in their hand. An instinct to squeeze a finger would mean that babies would run around and find a finger to squeeze and would not ever let go, unless forced. In which case they would then move on to another finger. As for "sucking" it is a response from their stomach being empty and telling the brain it is hungry. Read a book!
The following comment supporting the idea that humans have instinct is wrong.
[Sex is not a learned response. How did the first humans mate without the general knowledge of others? Because it's an instinct.]
Hominids (the first humans), did have instincts, because their ancestors (primates) from which they evolved and were still closely linked DO have instincts. Hominids retained some of the instincts from their primate ancestors. However, MODERN DAY HUMANS DO NOT HAVE INSTINCTS. This is a scientifically proven fact that is irrefutable. Any other comments that humans do have instincts are simply misinformed opinion.
-----
Humans have lost instincts. Early hominids may have had instincts, for they were still somewhat closely related to primates, which do have instincts. However, modern day humans DO NOT have instincts.-----
There is currently no scientific evidence to support the idea that modern humans are the result of genetic engineering by extraterrestrial beings or other advanced civilizations. The evolutionary history of humans can be traced through fossil records, genetic studies, and anthropological evidence, showing that humans evolved over millions of years from common ancestors with other primates.
The quickest and easiest answer is simply "that's the way God made it.", but a more logical answer would be it is that way because if people lived before dinosaurs, the people would have killed them all and then destroy the planet very quickly
No---Actually, i knew one guy that was albino and actually did not have red eyes. Albino humans have pink eyes. on occasion they have very pale blue eyes. But no, they do not.
We, homo sapiens that is, are highly adaptable and as a result, can live in most climates on the Earth. However, we are just as suseptable to an Extiction Level Occurance like an asteroid hitting the Earth as the Dinos were 65 million years ago. But some of us may actually survive due to the bomb shelters and other facilities that have been build to protect humans from nukes.What makes us so successful? In part our adaptability but also our ability to manipulate our environment and the earth around us. We invented farming, animal husbandry, food storage, and genetic modification of food to make even more food. Our success is based on our science.-hope this helped,mimi :D
The larger brains had the result of making Neanderthals more aggressive and bullying but less cooperative. The smaller brained, cooperative, species killed off the aggressive bullies and their children.
humans can change the environment by polluting. Polluting can cause animals dieing or making the soil poisons. It can also cause the water to be poisons too.
Bromine is toxic to humans and the environment. Inhaling bromine gas can cause respiratory issues, skin contact can lead to irritation and burns, and ingestion can result in gastrointestinal problems. In the environment, bromine can have harmful effects on aquatic life and ecosystems if released in large quantities.
The natural environment around Coober Pedy has taken on an eerie moonscape-like appearance. This is a result of the mullock heaps formed by the opal diggings.
The primate is the result of many years evolution and indeed where humans originate from. They also provide much for the ecosystem.
Tabula Rasa :D
No, everything does not cause everything. For example, your bath will not result in me eating a sandwich; usage of my television won't result in your car running out of fuel.
An introduced species is a species that is living outside its native environment. This happens as a result of humans, either accidentally or on purpose. They can cause damage to the environment that they are introduced into. One example is the black rat being in North America even though it is from Europe.
what are the traits called that develope as a result of your environment
Yes, avoiding danger is an innate human instinct. All living things have three innate instincts; to survive (we eat, drink, and protect ourselves from the elements), to defend (we blink, duck, and avoid apparent dangers), and to reproduce (do I need to describe this one?).
Horses are not inherently evil. They are animals that behave based on their instincts and environment. Negative behavior in horses is usually the result of fear, pain, or poor training rather than them being inherently evil.
Instincts are passed down through genetics, genetically programmed behaviors that are inherited from parents to offspring. These instincts are the result of millions of years of evolution and are essential for survival and reproduction. They do not need to be taught because they are ingrained in an organism's biology.
Ozone thinning causes UV rays to enter the earth. they can cause various fatal problems for life on earth.