In theory, an imbalance of forces on a mass will cause an accelerating (or decelrating) force. In practice there are other quantifiables, for instance the requirement to overcome inertia, friction, air resistance etc
Unbalanced forces cause a change in motion by accelerating an object in the direction of the greater force. Balanced forces result in no change in motion since they cancel each other out, resulting in a state of equilibrium.
No. If the forces on an object are unbalanced, that means their sum is not zero, and there is a net force on the object. Since there is a net force on it, the object is accelerated, which is another way of saying that its velocity changes.
There is no such thing as "a balanced force" or "a unbalanced force". Only a group of two or more forces can be balanced or unbalanced. An unbalanced group of forces acting on an object causes accelerated motion of the object. A balanced group of forces doesn't.
A change in an object's motion can be caused by both balanced and unbalanced forces. Balanced forces result in no change in motion, while unbalanced forces cause acceleration or deceleration in the object's motion.
Both balanced and unbalanced forces can cause an object to move; however, balanced forces result in no change in an object's motion, while unbalanced forces cause an object to accelerate or decelerate.
more motion :O
unbalanced force
Unbalanced forces cause a change in motion by accelerating an object in the direction of the greater force. Balanced forces result in no change in motion since they cancel each other out, resulting in a state of equilibrium.
No. If the forces on an object are unbalanced, that means their sum is not zero, and there is a net force on the object. Since there is a net force on it, the object is accelerated, which is another way of saying that its velocity changes.
There is no such thing as "a balanced force" or "a unbalanced force". Only a group of two or more forces can be balanced or unbalanced. An unbalanced group of forces acting on an object causes accelerated motion of the object. A balanced group of forces doesn't.
A change in an object's motion can be caused by both balanced and unbalanced forces. Balanced forces result in no change in motion, while unbalanced forces cause acceleration or deceleration in the object's motion.
Both balanced and unbalanced forces can cause an object to move; however, balanced forces result in no change in an object's motion, while unbalanced forces cause an object to accelerate or decelerate.
No. An unbalanced force causes motion, but balanced forces keep a body in motion in a straight line at constant velocity, or at rest at constant 0 velocity.
Not exactly. 'Motion' or 'change of motion' are not force. But the only way to change an object's motion is to cause the group of forces on it to be unbalanced. If the object's motion is changing, then you can be sure that the group of forces acting on it is unbalanced.
forces push and pull on an object making the object move in the direction of the force. the stronger force would overcome the lesser force, causing the object's motion to go in the direction of the stronger force (newton's 2nd law).alsoif forces are balanced there s no acceleration hence there is no motion.....thus if forces are unbalanced the motion is in the same direction as the resultant force (the greater force acting on an object)When the forces acting on an object are unbalanced, The one with more mass will pull on the other one, causing a change in motion.
Unbalanced forces cause a change in an object's motion by either speeding it up, slowing it down, or changing its direction. The object will accelerate in the direction of the greater force.
Unbalanced forces can cause an object to accelerate in the direction of the greater force, leading to a change in its speed or direction of motion. Additionally, unbalanced forces can cause the object to deform or break if the forces exceed the object's strength or structural integrity.