Though this is fairly off topic, you should choose to broaden the way you ask your questions. In stead of making it a yes or no question, you should at least and "and why" at the end of your question.
Anyway, my answer to your question is no. I believe there should be a voting of some kind to appoint justices.
Nobody else can give your personal opinion for you!WikiAnswers will not write your paragraph for you, but we WILL help you learn how to do it yourself! Click on the Related Questions for even more information.Write sentences the way you speak - just pretend you are telling this to a friend, and write down what you would say. What would you tell them about this topic? Look up some facts about the current system! How would you explain the system to your friend? What does the current system mean to you? How can you support your opinions?If you just start writing, you will be through with your assignment before you know it!
This is an example of the system of checks and balances. The Executive Branch checks the Judicial Branch by appointing justices. The Judicial Branch can then check the Executive Branch by ruling Executive decisions as unconstitutional. This keeps one branch of government from becoming too powerful.
WikiAnswers will not write your homework for you, but we WILL help you learn how to do it yourself! Click on the Related Questions for even more information.You are the only one who can decide your opinions!Write sentences the way you speak - just pretend you are telling this to a friend, and write down what you would say. What would you tell them about this topic? Look up some facts about the current justice system! How would you explain your viewpoint to your friend? What reasons would you give for making your choice?If you just start writing, you will be through with your assignment before you know it!
Under checks and balances system of constitution, executive branch "checks" legislative branch through veto power. Executive branch "checks" judicial branch through appointment power (appointing judges/justices).
Use of public offices as rewards for political party work is known as "Spoils System." The system is popular in numerous nations
The process for appointing Supreme Court justices does not involve the vice president. Instead, the President of the United States nominates candidates for the Supreme Court. These nominees are then subject to confirmation by the Senate, which holds hearings and votes on the appointment. This process ensures a system of checks and balances between the executive and legislative branches of government.
The spoils system.
Federal judges on the US Supreme Court are called justices.
From the current looks of it, it won't. According to the support team, the current Hotmail system wasn't built to support IMAP. However, Hotmail was late to support POP3, so it could be possible that they'll be slow to support IMAP as well.
The Oklahoma Supreme Court has nine justices. They are responsible for overseeing the state's judicial system and hearing appeals in civil and criminal cases. Justices are appointed by the governor and are confirmed by the Oklahoma Senate, with a system in place for retention elections.
Most likely the Spoils System.
Incorporate all of the business functions of the current STAMIS into one integrated system