Boiling point of a molecular substance depends on the intermolecular forces - forces that attracts a molecule to its neighbours of the same kind.
For a covalent molecule, the possible intermolecular forces are
As the strength and magnitude of the intermolecular forces increase, the boiling point increases because it becomes increasingly difficult to break the bonds and requires more energy for the same.
Since different types of intermolecular bonding are present, the answer to the question cannot be given in a single sentence.
Analyzing all types:
If, for large covalent molecules, the intermolecular forces increase, then the boiling point will increase.
If only dispersion forces are present, then as the number of electrons increases (and consequently the mass), so will the dispersion forces. Therefore, boiling points will be higher.
If only dipole-dipole bonding is present, then, as the molecule increases in size, the charge is dispersed in the molecule, strength of the polarity decreases and thus the intermolecular forces decreases. Therefore, boiling point decreases.
If only hydrogen bonding were present, the strength of the bond will depend on the halogen atom with which hydrogen forms a bond. It does not depend on the mass/size of the molecule.
However, dipole-dipole and hydrogen bonding can never exist in a substance on their own but with dispersion forces.
Therefore, as the mass/size of a covalent molecule increases, the dispersion forces increase and will lead to a higher boiling point independent of hydrogen bonding and the decrease in dipole-dipole bonding will be compensated by an equal or higher increase in dispersion forces.
Large covalent molecules do not have low boiling points (in comparison with small covalent molecules). But boiling point of covalent molecules, in general, is less than that of ionic molecules.
Covalent means that atoms or radicals share electrons rather than transferring them. Macromolecular means a molecule that is so large that it is visible; normally this refers to polymers. While it is true that you would find covalent bonds in a macromolecule, the meanings of these two terms are different.
What's in a name? The division between the two is arbitrary at the extremes of large molecules although even extremely large molecules may have a definite known molecular formula (for instance proteins), whereas a covalent network may only be known as multiple repeats of a simple unit, such as (SiO2)n )
Yes, due to the large difference in electronegativity between O and H in glucose, and H being directly bonded to an O atom, glucose will be able to form hydrogn bonds. Yes, due to the large difference in electronegativity between O and H in glucose, and H being directly bonded to an O atom, glucose will be able to form hydrogn bonds.
The combination of a metal with a nonmetal yields an ionic compound, and if only metals are involved you get a metallic bond, and if only nonmetals are involved you get covalent bonds. The other technique is to look up the actual electronegativity of the elements involved in the reaction, and determine how great a difference in electronegativity there is. A large difference produces an ionic compound, a small difference produces a covalent compound.
No, NO is not a polar covalent bond. NO is a diatomic molecule consisting of one nitrogen atom and one oxygen atom covalently bonded together, forming a nonpolar covalent bond because the electronegativity difference between nitrogen and oxygen is not large enough to create a significant dipole moment.
Ferric oxide is not a covalent compound, it forms a large ionic lattice.
Covalent means that atoms or radicals share electrons rather than transferring them. Macromolecular means a molecule that is so large that it is visible; normally this refers to polymers. While it is true that you would find covalent bonds in a macromolecule, the meanings of these two terms are different.
Polymer is a large molecule composed of unit molecules called monomers.
That would be a description of water, i.e. H2O
A polymer is a large molecule which is composed of repeating structural units called monomer connected to each other by covalent chemical bonds.
What's in a name? The division between the two is arbitrary at the extremes of large molecules although even extremely large molecules may have a definite known molecular formula (for instance proteins), whereas a covalent network may only be known as multiple repeats of a simple unit, such as (SiO2)n )
Yes, due to the large difference in electronegativity between O and H in glucose, and H being directly bonded to an O atom, glucose will be able to form hydrogn bonds. Yes, due to the large difference in electronegativity between O and H in glucose, and H being directly bonded to an O atom, glucose will be able to form hydrogn bonds.
The combination of a metal with a nonmetal yields an ionic compound, and if only metals are involved you get a metallic bond, and if only nonmetals are involved you get covalent bonds. The other technique is to look up the actual electronegativity of the elements involved in the reaction, and determine how great a difference in electronegativity there is. A large difference produces an ionic compound, a small difference produces a covalent compound.
No, NO is not a polar covalent bond. NO is a diatomic molecule consisting of one nitrogen atom and one oxygen atom covalently bonded together, forming a nonpolar covalent bond because the electronegativity difference between nitrogen and oxygen is not large enough to create a significant dipole moment.
Covalent bonds. Large molecules may gain "shape" due to intra-molecular forces between one part of the molecule and another- for example hydrogen bonds in biological molecules.
A strongest polar covalent bond cannot be defined as every such bonds contain ionic and covalent properties to a certain percentage.
It's due to the facts that simple covalent bonds like single bonds are weaker and longer than others bonds with tighter interactions like pi bonds (double bonds) or ionic bonds. Once the heat is turned up it excites the electrons to move from their bonded positions and the bond breaks