No. Judicial notice is only used when an event or condition is commonly known to citizens of that district. For example, a judge may take judicial notice that Main Street runs from north to south; or that the weather on June 2, 2010 was 76 degrees and partly cloudy. Decisions in another jurisdiction are known as "persuasive authority," meaning the judge can take them into consideration, but does not have to do so, and definitely does not need to follow those decisions.
Judicial Branch judge jurisdiction jury
Not necessarily. He may have a reasonable argument that he did have jurisdiction.
Call the Clerk of Courts office and ask if that particular judge is assigned to your judicial district.
A judge typically answers to higher courts within the judicial system, such as appellate courts or supreme courts, depending on the jurisdiction. Additionally, in many cases, judges are appointed or elected and may be accountable to a judicial oversight body or commission. Ultimately, their authority is derived from the constitution, laws, and the legal framework of the jurisdiction in which they serve.
Arrest warrants can be issued by any judicial officer having jurisdiction. (e.g.: Justice of the Peace - Magistrate - Judge).
A notice of judicial assignment is a formal notification that informs parties involved in a legal case about the judge or magistrate assigned to preside over the matter. This document typically includes details such as the case number, the assigned judge's name, and pertinent dates for hearings or filings. It ensures that all parties are aware of who will be overseeing the proceedings, promoting transparency and organization within the judicial process.
there isn't really one judge of the judicial branch
That would be judicial misconduct. A judge is supposed to only rule on issues before the court of jurisdiction.
Yes, a superior court judge can be subjected to judicial review, but typically only in specific circumstances. Judicial review allows higher courts to evaluate the legality of a judge's decisions or actions, particularly if there are claims of errors in law, procedural irregularities, or violations of rights. However, the standard for judicial review is high, and it generally does not involve re-evaluating the merits of a case already decided by the judge. It's important to consult relevant legal frameworks, as procedures and grounds for review can vary by jurisdiction.
The Judicial BranchThe US Supreme Court, head of the Judicial Branch, has exclusive original jurisdiction over disputes between states, and becomes a trial court for lawsuits by one state against another. Ordinarily it is an appellate court.
A JUDICIAL Officer must review the affidavit for legal sufficiency - once they sign it it becomes valid. A judicial officer would include a Judge, Justice Of The Peace, or a Magistrate.