No, and usually they are not. Also: It is not an indictment "hearing," it is an indictment presentment to the Grand Jury.
In general, defendants are required to be present during all felony proceedings, including arraignment, plea hearings, and trial. However, there may be exceptions when a defendant can be excused from some proceedings, such as when they waive their right to be present or when their presence would disrupt the proceedings. Ultimately, it depends on the specific circumstances and the discretion of the judge.
That can only be answered by the presiding judge in the case. The defendant's attorney would have to ask the judge's permission for the defendant's absence. As a practical matter, this is likely only to be granted during pre-trial proceedings. For the trial, the defendant is required to be present.
Yes. By law they are required to be present during the court proceedings.
The judge had singled out the defendant to address during the court proceedings.
The Grand Jury is of the opinion, sufficient evidence was present during the grand jury testimony to proceed with a trial of the defendant. This is known as indictment.
Alexander Luders has written: 'Reports of the proceedings in committees of the House of Commons, upon controverted elections, heard and determined during the present Parliament. ... By Alexander Luders, ..' 'Reports of the proceedings in committees of the House of Commons, upon controverted elections, heard and determined during the present Parliament ..' -- subject(s): Great Britain. Parliament, Great Britain, Contested elections
Illinois v. Allen :: 397 U.S. 337 (1970) It basically means a defendant has a right to be present during a trial, as per Constitutional rights, unless the defendant is disruptive. Then, the person can be removed and the trial go on without the person there.
Any time you're being prosecuted for a crime you have the right to be present in court. The only time you may not be brought to court is during motion hearings or during witness questioning.Ultimately the judge also has the right to order you to be removed from the courtroom until such time the judge deems fit for your return.However, you cannot be convicted without formally being present in a court of law.Addition and clarification: While the majority of the above answer is correct, the final sentence needs clarification. A judge CAN order a defendant from the court room and confined to some location where they can witness the proceedings (e.g.: on closed circuit TV), but as long as they are represented by counsel, they are considered to be "present" (if not in body) in the courtroom.
English became the official language of the United States during the late 18th century, with the passage of the Constitution in 1787 and the establishment of English as the language of government proceedings. It was solidified with the passing of the Judiciary Act of 1789, which required federal court proceedings to be conducted in English.
Lawsuits brought by lenders are always civil court cases which do not involve arresting a defendant. There are cases, however, where a judge wants the borrower (or their legal representative) to be present during court proceedings. In these cases, the judge may place a bench warrant which will result in eventual arrest. The goal here, is not jail, but to get the borrower to show up and take responsibility for their actions.
say yes or no
Due Process
Due process