No. Mercury does not have any moons.
The nearness of Mercury to the Sun (which exerts much more gravitational influence than the planet) is the likely reason that no natural satellites are present. It is unlikely but possible that one or more may have existed in the past.
There is no evidence to suggest that Mercury ever had a moon.
The nearness of Mercury to the Sun (which exerts much more gravitational influence than the planet) is the likely reason that no natural satellites are present. It is unlikely but possible that one or more may have existed in the past.
Mercury has no satellites or moons, neither does Venus.
The earth has 1 moon. Mars has 2 and all the other planets have considerably more moons than Mars.
Mars has two small known moons called Phobos and Diemos.
No. There are no moons around the planet Mercury.
(see related question)
Mercury has no known moons as far as can be determined. A moon of even fairly small size would have been detected by the MESSENGER probe orbiting the planet.
no it is to close to the sun and if it did have a moon it would be torn apart by the sun and the planet
Mercury has no moons
No, not at all. poor little guy. :)
Mercury has no moons.
no
mercury has no moons or rings therefore it has nothing orbiting it although it orbits the sun.
no there is no rings or moons orbiting Venus. because there is no ring system.
None. Mercury is too close to the sun. Also Mercury doesn't have any rings.
it has neither. also there are no man made orbiting spacecrafts.
There are no rings orbiting Mercury
no
mercury has no moons or rings therefore it has nothing orbiting it although it orbits the sun.
no
yes it does
Mercury does not have any rings.
There are no rings around earth, or any of the rocky planets.
No
yes
Mercury has no rings
Mercury has no moons, and no rings have been observed. Either moons or rings may have existed, but this is not considered a likely possibility.
no