0
Equilibrium is when the quantity demanded is no longer equal to the quantity supplied?
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
false
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What happens to equilibrium price and quantity when there is an increase in the consumers income?
When one part of the equation is increased (consumer income) than the equation no longer had equequilibrium.
What is an economic floor?
Price FloorsA price floor is the lowest legal price a commodity can be sold at. Price floors are used by the government to prevent prices from being too low. The most common price floor is the minimum wage--the minimum price that can be payed for labor. Price floors are also used often in agriculture to try to protect farmers. For a price floor to be effective, it must be set above the equilibrium price. If it's not above equilibrium, then the market won't sell below equilibrium and the price floor will be irrelevant.Drawing a price floor is simple. Simply draw a straight, horizontal line at the price floor level. This graph shows a price floor at $3.00. You'll notice that the price floor is above the equilibrium price, which is $2.00 in this example.A few crazy things start to happen when a price floor is set. First of all, the price floor has raised the price above what it was at equilibrium, so the demanders (consumers) aren't willing to buy as much quantity. The demanders will purchase the quantity where the quantity demanded is equal to the price floor, or where the demand curve intersects the price floor line. On the other hand, since the price is higher than what it would be at equilibrium, the suppliers (producers) are willing to supply more than the equilibrium quantity. They will supply where their marginal cost is equal to the price floor, or where the supply curve intersects the price floor line.As you might have guessed, this creates a problem. There is less quantity demanded (consumed) than quantity supplied (produced). This is called a surplus. If the surplus is allowed to be in the market then the price would actually drop below the equilibrium. In order to prevent this the government must step in. The government has a few options:1. They can buy up all the surplus. For a while the US government bought grain surpluses in the US and then gave all the grain to Africa. This might have been nice for African consumers, but it destroyed African farmers.2. They can strictly enforce the price floor and let the surplus go to waste. This means that the suppliers that are able to sell their goods are better off while those who can't sell theirs (because of lack of demand) will be worse off. Minimum wage laws, for example, mean that some workers who are willing to work at a lower wage don't get to work at all. Such workers make up a portion of the unemployed (this is called "structural unemployment").3. The government can control how much is produced. To prevent too many suppliers from producing, the government can give out production rights or pay people not to produce. Giving out production rights will lead to lobbying for the lucrative rights or even bribery. If the government pays people not to produce, then suddenly more producers will show up and ask to be payed.4. They can also subsidize consumption. To get demanders to purchase more of the surplus, the government can pay part of the costs. This would obviously get expensive really fast.Although some of those ideas may sound stupid, the US government has done them. In the end, a price floor hurts society more than it helps. It may help farmers or the few workers that get to work for minimum wage, but it only helps those people by hurting everyone else. Price floors cause a deadweight welfare loss.A deadweight welfare loss occurs whenever there is a difference between the price the marginal demander is willing to pay and the equilibrium price. The deadweight welfare loss is the loss of consumer and producer surplus. In other words, any time a regulation is put into place that moves the market away from equilibrium, beneficial transactions that would have occured can no longer take place. In the case of a price floor, the deadweight welfare loss is shown by a triangle on the left side of the equilibrium point, like in the graph. The area of the triangle is the amount of money that society loses.
Can you explain why there is no pressure for the equilibrium price to change?
The equilibrium price exists when at that price supply and demand for a product are equal. Apparently at that price level everybody is happy and as long as nothing changes there will be no pressure. If it would arise because of an increase in eithersupply or demand, the price would no longer be an equilibrium price and it would shift to another - higher or lower - level.
What is crowding costs?
In economics, crowding out is a phenomenon occurring when Expansionary Fiscal Policy causes interest rates to rise, thereby reducing investment spending. That means increase in government spending crowds out investment spending.Changes in fiscal policy shifts the IS curve, the curve which describes equilibrium in the goods market. A Fiscal Expansion shifts IS curve to the right from IS1 to IS2. A fiscal expansion increases equilibrium income from Y1 to Y2 and interest rates from i1 to i2. At unchanged interest rates i1, the higher level of government spending increase the level of Aggregate Demand. This increase in demand must be met by rise in output. At each level of interest rate, equilibrim income must rise by the multiplier times the increase in government spending.If the interest rate stayed constant at i1, the goods market is in equilibrium in that planned spending equals output, but the assets market is no longer in equilibrium. Income has increased, and, therefore, the quantity of money demanded is higher. Because there is an excessive demand for real balances, the interest rate rises. Firms planned spending declines at higher interest rates, thus the aggregate demand falls. Therefore, the equilibrium is at higher interest rates. The adjustment of interest rates and their impact on aggregate demand dampen the expansionary effect of the increased government spending.Source: Wikipedia
Why the market is unstable at consumer equilibrium?
There are many reasons why a consumer market equilibrium may be unstable, and it depends on which school of economic thought you follow. Generally, if there actually is a consumer equilibrium (which some believe does not truly occur) then what will cause it to become unstable is the effect of random shocks: I.e.) let future consumption for any period be ct+j = ct + Et. E is a random shock variable which is normally distributed around the mean (which we'll assume to be 0). Consumption in any period is simply equal to consumption in the period of time = t plus whatever shocks occurs in the economy (i.e.) political unrest, social movements, oil crises, etc.). In an economy, small shifts in variables such as consumption can cause larger changes because once an economy moves away from equilibrium, it causes a resulting change in other key equations which is no longer optimal. How the economy restores to equilibrium is also a debate amongst economist: Keynesians believe that wages/prices are 'sticky' and thus equilibrium is slow to reoccur after a shock; classicists believe that wages/prices are not sticky so that equilibrium will reestablish itself quickly. The rate at which an economy corrects these shocks will also affect how unstable equilibrium is. Finally, equilibrium can also constantly change due to factors such as technological growth. The economy needs time and information to adjust to these new equilibria and this can cause instability.
What happens to equilibrium price and quantity when there is an increase in the consumers income?
When one part of the equation is increased (consumer income) than the equation no longer had equequilibrium.
What is it called when objects have the same temperature and the energy is no longer being transferred between two objects?
equilibrium state----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- -----'Thermal Equilibrium'.
Why does it take longer for a larger quantity of ice to melt then it does for a smaller quantity?
Because there is more ice.
What is it called when heat no longer flows?
entropy2nd opinion: thermal equilibrium
What is the difference between no more and no longer?
no more= quantity eg no more foodno longer= duration eg I can stay here no longer
What is the balance in motion of particles when a concentration difference no longer exists in the solution called?
equilibrium
When do you know dynamic equilibrium as occurred in a solution?
When it no longer absorbs or emits energy from the surroundings.
What would be the direction of the line graph if the energy supplied is extended five minutes longer?
where's the line graph
What is an economic floor?
Price FloorsA price floor is the lowest legal price a commodity can be sold at. Price floors are used by the government to prevent prices from being too low. The most common price floor is the minimum wage--the minimum price that can be payed for labor. Price floors are also used often in agriculture to try to protect farmers. For a price floor to be effective, it must be set above the equilibrium price. If it's not above equilibrium, then the market won't sell below equilibrium and the price floor will be irrelevant.Drawing a price floor is simple. Simply draw a straight, horizontal line at the price floor level. This graph shows a price floor at $3.00. You'll notice that the price floor is above the equilibrium price, which is $2.00 in this example.A few crazy things start to happen when a price floor is set. First of all, the price floor has raised the price above what it was at equilibrium, so the demanders (consumers) aren't willing to buy as much quantity. The demanders will purchase the quantity where the quantity demanded is equal to the price floor, or where the demand curve intersects the price floor line. On the other hand, since the price is higher than what it would be at equilibrium, the suppliers (producers) are willing to supply more than the equilibrium quantity. They will supply where their marginal cost is equal to the price floor, or where the supply curve intersects the price floor line.As you might have guessed, this creates a problem. There is less quantity demanded (consumed) than quantity supplied (produced). This is called a surplus. If the surplus is allowed to be in the market then the price would actually drop below the equilibrium. In order to prevent this the government must step in. The government has a few options:1. They can buy up all the surplus. For a while the US government bought grain surpluses in the US and then gave all the grain to Africa. This might have been nice for African consumers, but it destroyed African farmers.2. They can strictly enforce the price floor and let the surplus go to waste. This means that the suppliers that are able to sell their goods are better off while those who can't sell theirs (because of lack of demand) will be worse off. Minimum wage laws, for example, mean that some workers who are willing to work at a lower wage don't get to work at all. Such workers make up a portion of the unemployed (this is called "structural unemployment").3. The government can control how much is produced. To prevent too many suppliers from producing, the government can give out production rights or pay people not to produce. Giving out production rights will lead to lobbying for the lucrative rights or even bribery. If the government pays people not to produce, then suddenly more producers will show up and ask to be payed.4. They can also subsidize consumption. To get demanders to purchase more of the surplus, the government can pay part of the costs. This would obviously get expensive really fast.Although some of those ideas may sound stupid, the US government has done them. In the end, a price floor hurts society more than it helps. It may help farmers or the few workers that get to work for minimum wage, but it only helps those people by hurting everyone else. Price floors cause a deadweight welfare loss.A deadweight welfare loss occurs whenever there is a difference between the price the marginal demander is willing to pay and the equilibrium price. The deadweight welfare loss is the loss of consumer and producer surplus. In other words, any time a regulation is put into place that moves the market away from equilibrium, beneficial transactions that would have occured can no longer take place. In the case of a price floor, the deadweight welfare loss is shown by a triangle on the left side of the equilibrium point, like in the graph. The area of the triangle is the amount of money that society loses.
Can you explain why there is no pressure for the equilibrium price to change?
The equilibrium price exists when at that price supply and demand for a product are equal. Apparently at that price level everybody is happy and as long as nothing changes there will be no pressure. If it would arise because of an increase in eithersupply or demand, the price would no longer be an equilibrium price and it would shift to another - higher or lower - level.
Does a replacement exhaust for a Honda civic aero deck 98 have to be supplied from a Honda dealer?
No, but an exaust from Honda will last longer than a reproduction.
Does the size of ice affect how fast it melts in liquid?
Yes. Larger quantity of ice while take longer to melt.
