Want this question answered?
rgrth
You are confusing a couple of concepts. NO superstitious belief has a scientific basis. If a belief is scientifically based, there is no need to call it a superstition. If a belief is superstitious it is by definition not verifiable scientifically. However, there are superstitions that result from some real events. Total eclipses of the sun are real, and they are explainable in completely natural terms. However, people at different times in history have superstitious beliefs about what is happening during an eclipse, and superstitious beliefs that performing certain rituals or prayers during an eclipse will save the world from doom. So, a superstition is an irrational belief usually connected to some magical ritual that will ward off disaster, and some superstitions have to do with real events in the world. But the superstitions themselves are not based in or verified by the real world.
Nope! it's a scientific study of our universe. Astrology however, is a belief.
The Scientific Revolution
There is no scientific evidence that any gods exist. Many people have a 'personal god' that exists in their thoughts. One of humanity's greatest talents is the ability to create elaborate belief systems that bring solace, comfort and hope and provide a hypothetical barrier between humans and the great unknown. That behavior is evidenced by the thousands of creation stories and belief systems that have been formulated throughout the history of human life. However, there is no scientific proof that gods exist. Religious beliefs cannot be proven by science. Science explores the natural world. All religious belief is based on faith. Faith is an unquestioning belief in something in the absence of proof. Religious beliefs exist in the absence of proof.
Question needs clarifications
People living in the Philippines are very superstitious but are not oblivious to scientific explanations. Many believe in superstitions but will work around them based on the scientific knowledge that is available.
There are none. By definition, a supersition does not have a scientific basis.
eh, kwan, marik ammu
Psychology is a scientific study that uses empirical evidence to understand and explain human behavior, while false explanations of behavior are typically based on unfounded beliefs, personal opinions, or pseudoscience. Psychology relies on rigorous research methods and peer-reviewed evidence to support its findings, whereas false explanations lack scientific validation and may be based on superstition, anecdotal evidence, or bias.
Scientists do have beliefs. Scientific beliefs are based upon scientific observation and analysis. If people have beliefs which are not based upon scientific observation and analysis, then those beliefs are not relevant to science.
Some of the superstitions about eclipses include: them being the omen of death of some high-ranking person; the harbinger of some dreadful national calamity. Some cultures make loud noises to ward against the "evil" spirits of the event.
Pseudoscience refers to beliefs or practices that claim to be scientific but lack empirical evidence, are not backed by the scientific community, and often rely on unfounded assumptions or faulty reasoning. Examples include astrology, homeopathy, and creationism.
Scientific facts are based on evidence, beliefs are not
Black cat crossing your path. Throwing salt over your shoulder. Haunted houses. All the above 3 have no scientific precedent.
Scientific Attitudes are attitudes a scientist should possess in order to be successful or to successful solve problems. Here are some examples of Scientific Attitudes: Open-mindedness Perseverance Humility Flexibility
A superstitious person is one who beliefs that certain signs (omens), rituals, or behaviors can produce or foretell a change in one's own fortune or future. Such beliefs have been largely deemed irrational in the face of scientific explanations for the dynamic of the world around us.