Examples of procedural programming language

Answer 1

1. ABC
2. Ada
3. Algol 60
4. Algol 68
5. APL
6. Arc
7. Assembly
8. Awk
9. BASIC
10. Batch
11. BCPL
12. Befunge
13. BETA
14. C
15. C++
16. C--
17. C# (pronounced C-sharp)
18. CHILL
19. Clipper
20. Cobol
21. CobolScript
22. Component Pascal
23. Cyclone
24. D
25. DATABUS
26. Euphoria
27. Forth
28. Fortran
29. Free Pascal
30. GNU Pascal
31. Icon
32. IDL
33. Jal
34. JavaScript
35. Jovial
36. Lagoona
37. Leda
38. Limbo
39. Lua
40. m4
41. Maple
42. Mathematica
43. MATLAB
44. Modula-2
45. Modula-3
46. Mumps
47. Oberon
48. Objective Caml (OCaml)
49. Occam
50. Oz-Mozart
51. Pascal
52. Perl
53. PHP
54. PL
55. PL/1
56. Pliant
57. PL/SQL
58. PostScript
59. PowerBuilder
60. Proteus
61. REBOL
62. Rexx
63. S-Lang
64. Small C
65. Snobol
66. Tcl-Tk
67. T3X
68. VBA
69. Visual Basic
70. Visual DialogScript
71. Yorick

Note: Some of these languages, such as PHP, Perl, Caml/OCaml, and IDL also support object oriented programming. Others on the list (C++, JavaScript, C# ) are primarily object-oriented languages which can also (though less commonly) be used to program procedurally.

Some are macro or scripting languages (Rexx, Awk, m4) which, while they do support some procedural concepts, aren't really procedural languages, but rather interpreted streams.

Also note that Assembly is NOT a high-level language, and generally is not considered a procedural language, as it doesn't have enough abstraction.

Finally, traditional COBOL is NOT a procedural language (in fact, one of the long-standing criticism of it is that it lacks any structured programming characteristics). Current-day COBOL has some ability to use procedural programming concepts, but, overall, should not be considered a real procedural language. SNOBOL is similar, in that the original version were certainly not procedural in nature, but modern versions are much more structured programming friendly (and can be considered a procedural language).

Answer 2

Procedural programming is unstructured so there are no structured loops or procedure calls. Code is written procedurally with conditional jumps or gotos to determine the flow of control. Although the code can be directly mapped to a flowchart, the code is "spaghetti" in nature, making it much more difficult to follow the logic than with structured languages.

Machine code is the ultimate example of the procedural paradigm, as is assembly language. Most of the early languages such as cobol, pascal and BASIC were also procedural but had a much greater level of abstraction (hence they became the first high-level languages). Most of these languages are now multi-paradigm languages, supporting procedural, structured and object-oriented paradigms. C is a mid-level language that primarily provides low-level procedural programming within a structured language -- making it easier to produce efficient machine code without the complexities of assembly language. C++ extends C to provide object-oriented support. By contrast, Java is a non-procedural high-level language, being an entirely object-oriented language from the outset.

Answer 3

Computer programming languages are used to create software, webpages, perform scientific calculations, and do a number of other things. Three programming languages are Java, Visual Basic, and C Sharp.

Answer 4

There are only 3 levels. Native machine code, low-level assembler and high-level languages. Terms such as 3GL and 4GL are meaningless. High-level languages are and always have been categorised according to whether they are imperative, declarative, functional, object oriented, domain specific and so on.

Answer 5

There are only three major types of programming language, not four.

1. Machine code: the native language of the computer. All other languages must be assembled, compiled or interpreted to machine code in order to execute. Machine code is platform-specific; code written specifically for one platform cannot be executed upon any other platform.
2. Low-level code: a symbolic language known as Assembler Language that allows machine code to be constructed using a system of mnemonics and symbols in place of binary instructions and operands. A machine code program (the Assembler) translates the low-level code to produce the required machine code. Every platform has it's own version of Assembler Language.
3. High-level code: an abstract symbolic language that uses human-readable keywords (typically English-based) and sentence-like structures to convey logic. High-level code can be platform-specific, however the level of abstraction is such that code can often be compiled to suit any platform, provided a suitable compiler or interpreter exists for that platform.

The vast majority of programming languages are high-level as the abstraction between the source code and the platform allows programmers to concentrate on functionality rather than the specific capabilities of the machine(s). High-level languages can be further classified by whether they are imperative, declarative, procedural, structured, object-oriented, functional, logical, domain-specific, or hybrid.

Although high-level languages were once classified as third-generation languages (3GL) to coincide with the evolution of third-generation hardware, the term has no practical meaning (prior to that there were no 1GL or 2GL languages). And while marketing types have attempted to garner favour by using the equally meaningless terms 4GL and 5GL, they have largely been abandoned today. Some language implementations still occasionally use the terms to promote their brand, but there is no official specification that differentiates one generation from another. A myriad of unsuccessful attempts to clarify the exact meanings only serve to underline the fact they had no meaning to begin with.

Answer 6

c

pascal

basic

cobol

fotran

the main thing is BASIC..

Answer 7

1)with return type

no arguements

2)with return type with arguements

3)with out return type no arguements

4)with out return type with arguements

Answer 8

visual basic,sql

Answer 9

C++ Java PHP ASP